But, But, But We went to the Moon!!! You have to believe it, you must believe it because the Government said you had to believe it! Just like 911, and all the other made up crap that they say we must believe! It's amazing what Hollywood and the Government/CIA can do to make us believe in their BS.
I beginning to think that they absolutely want us to know, yet at the same time they want us to know we must pretend to not know. They are mind Fuc$er’s!
These international criminals and royal and noble crime bloodlines are threatening society with more fake epidemics, weaponized forced vaccinations, wars based on lies, civil war, world war, martial law, and genocides. They are attacking society with secret societies, organized crime, corporate fraud, and electronic weapons. These bloodlines spread plagues and have been doing that for hundreds of years. These families are behind all the major wars including World War I and World War II. When real people stand up to tyrants like them they infiltrate opposition such as the American Revolutionary War which was hijacked by Freemasons. These criminals collectively have trillions of dollars in offshore accounts in Switzerland, Liechtenstein, and Luxembourg and they are controlling the Bank for International Settlements. They extort governments and people and make hundreds of billions per year through organized crime. They torment people with electronic weapons. The entire electronic grid has been weaponized with neuro-bio hacking programs. They finance continual lying in society through the media and entertainment. Their primary tactics are lying, making false accusations against people who expose them, and using phony arrogance to appear like they are in control at all times.
This is excellent empirical evidence! I always take GOD’s word as the Standard to test science. Since we live under an atheistic science community, the data we see will always be contrary to scripture, therefore we can trust that whatever we are told by mainstream Scientism, we can take the opposite as gospel truth! Plain and simple.
How is this countered? What is the mental gymnastics needed for one to continue to beLIEve. There’s no way to refute, this topic. I haul tanker trailers & am aware of the vacuum effect explosion, but never want to see it in person. First I am hearing this notion & fully comprehend there is not a rebuttal.
The rebuttal is simple. The article deploys a grossly flawed assumption (straw man, really): there is no "wall" between the atmosphere and the vacuum of outer space.
Being a dumbass, guy does not know or care about the self-sorting properties of PLASMA DOUBLE LAYERS in the atmosphere. It is the electromagetically low energy layers of earth's dark mode plasma layers which constrain the atmosphere and isolate it from the surrounding vacuum as ably demonstrated in the SAFIRE vacuum plasma experiments.
And just what constrains the spherical concentric shells of the SAFIRE apparatus's atmosphere from exploding outwards into the vacuum of the chamber? There's no 'wall' between the plasma and the vacuum (there is only containment between the vacuum and earth atmosphere). Its only hydrogen gas electrified into a plasma state, separated into visible double layers, self-sorted, and held in place by the laws of electromagnetism.
Now I know that SAFIRE has several theoretical flaws which makes it unsuitable as a true analogue to earth or the sun: SAFIRE's orb was an anode, whereas earth and the sun are electrically cathodes (Juergens was wrong on this point), so a copper orb cathode encased with a steel anode would have been more accurate representation of our solar system's dynamics. Sadly we will never see any experiment reversing SAFIRE's polarity despite our repeated requests.
Second, the entire apparatus is encased, an unfortunate necessity of terrestrial vacuum research, whereas the solar system is open and free to all electronmagnetic particle movement (e.g. solar wind, cosmic rays). The only actual space vacuum research I am aware of is that done by the Russians on ISS, and they certainly were not testing the SAFIRE device in open space, which is the next necessary step: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=R4Z_-WbDs4U
Thirdly, SAFIRE's orb has no magnetic field, unlike earth or the sun. This may result in changes to the shape of the SAFIRE orb's hydrogen plasma atmosphere.
Fourth, no SAFIRE experiments have utilised earth minerals (e.g. granite) as the cathode orb, nor standard earth air (N2 O2 Ar He H2 CO2) to see what might happen with spherical atmospheric formation in a vacuum. I doubt any such experiments will occur despite our requests for them.
But those significant points aside, it is still a practical demonstration that a sphere can form a layered plasma atmosphere in a vacuum without any outward 'explosion' of the atmosphere against the vacuum. The electromagnetic properties of the hydrogen plasma are enough to retain its spherical shape, layering and overall electrical isolation from the surrounding vacuum. And because plasma physics is unbiquitous across the entire universe at every scale, micro to macro, they can apply equally to planetary atmospheres as much as to SAFIRE's star simulation.
It may just be that your precious raqi'a is the same layered atmospheric plasma phenomenon that once upon a time in ancient memory was previously visible in the sky and resembled a solid curved disc or upturned bowl. That same plasma layer(s) still exists now, only in dark mode rather than glow, because of catastrophic alterations of earth's electrical environs in the millennia between then and now.
extraordinary article it makes total sense My intuition is all I have as I am not a scientist
Before being a TV producer I never believed the moon landing was real I also wondered for many years about the technology of space suits gravity the atmosphere and the dangers of our irresponsible deranged Deep State psychopaths that are intent on destroying our beautiful planet and humanity and every living thing that God created including our Ozone layer
I like your view, but still, you are missing basics.
A plasma layer does exist, many of them do. How they exist at such distance from Earth is seemingly unknown, as no one has get higher than about 50 miles from surface (from what proof is available). Text books claim the atmosphere simply diffuses, but we do not know for sure, or know what plasma sheaths are involved.
Now, what you miss is this- any Plasma manifold/sheathing etc that can contain the pressure differentials explained above would be in effect a SOLID WALL to particles not of a very specific resonance. It would be AKIN to the glass dome idea (that is probably ridiculous, but a PLASMA/ETHERIC dome is not so ridiculous, & in fact very alluring possibility. I do not claim any dome is there, as I do not claim to know for sure anything I have not experienced, but still, it is POTENTIAL that can be considered.
I will speculate though , that the PLASMA (which is first stage of manifest FORMATIVE ETHERS ) COULD BE so concentrated (ie charged - not compressed per se) as to be in effect a zone of SLOW TIME . ie it would take many years of travel to get through just a few meters of PLASMA (or whatever form PLASMAs adopt in such 'alien' environments' . In effect, outer space may be only a relatively tiny space around us , but is always EFFECTIVLY almost INFINITE to our current bodily form.
This is very exciting arena for speculation & experiment, & I have written a paper on such & begun serialising it on my pages, if you care to consider it, I would very much enjoy reading what you think. Thank you.
Nobody knows for sure the composition of The Firmament. I suspect it has many layers and a plasma layer is highly likely, along with quasi vitreous and crystalline layers. It's all speculation.
Yes , yet - I doubt 'solid' things exist there as we perceive on earth, the 'crystal' may be the thing itself in otherwords- ie we are within it.
I am awaiting your reaction to my cosmology paper, at the moment I do not think you are totally serious about this topic, sadly.
I have no optimism for these types of investigation if such work is ignored, or treated like the typical excrement being deposited all over social platforms. Also to ignore such works implies that they will never be popular or inspire the means to mitigate the stupidity & clichés we are all being drowned in.
Only a few years ago (pre ConVD) works like this would have been praised as revolutionary synthesis, so I am very concerned what is happening with peoples low awareness & lack of inner fire.
Myself with best friends in UK. It is on my home page with 1st 4 parts- it is all written but I am sad at lack of interactions & awareness, so far. I may publish more after outing massive SHILL TEAM games now confirmed.
Resonant Field Cosmology: A Comparative Framework of Aetheric Dynamics and Symbolic Topology in Earth-Based and Plasma-Environ Systems
here is link for quick access- part TWO is best bit for beginners maybe?
Many people mentioned it in the past, but never so in depth & well presented as here.
The inversion is very wise as is the idea that things in space would be more rapid due to lack of friction etc.... so the 'under water/ slow motion' footage is a massive give away & error opposing academic claims of topology & environment.
Very scholarly article... my geek husband would love it! My only comment is: how come nobody mentioned the reflection on the space helmet... you know, the shadow of a regular person standing in a studio with all the paraphernalia around?? Or is that old hat by now? LOL
Yes Paula you are right I did zoom on that and see the cameraman shadow with no suit and that shadow of a pole going the wrong way too! Very interesting thank you for mentioning that.
Heat transfer without convection from a 98F body in a space suit to the 250F lunar surface. They never showed how they prevented heat from building up in the space suits. One would think they would try to prove that first before ridiculing the Moon Landing deniers.
Also, the temperature of 'near space' (just outside Earth atmosphere) are alleged to be 3,000'C - the same (at one time in text books) for the surface of the Sun.
The zone of greatest interest is allegedly between 55- 65 miles above surface, as there the temperature goes from -100'C to + 100'c in 10 miles !!!
I can not confirm this of course, but it is intriguing.
Also the distances & temperatures have changed since the 1970's texts books , but not by a great deal.
We're told that the almighty "gravity" keeps everything in its place and that even clouds are stapled to the surface of a sphere spinning at about 1000mph. I don't know how free floating cumuli manage to keep up but they do. Amazing. And, yet, we're also TOLD incessantly that mankind can now go to Mars! Woo woo! Nevermind that moon next door where nobody has supposedly set foot in the past fifty years. Move along now. Nothing to ponder too deeply now.
There is no outer space, it’s all been indoctrinated to us believing in a globe earth . So called space ships splash into the ocean away from prying eyes because they can’t punch a hole in the firmament. Wake up and be smart.
How much less pressure is there at 400 km altitude of ISS vs. the stratosphere air balloon jumper at 39 km altitude? The balloon guy had a space suit that appeared to work.
With the theoretical low pressure of Outer Space at 1×10-6 to <3×10-17 Torr 100 µPa to <3fPa, any pressure in a spacesuit would naturally expand outwards to fill any available volume in the surrounding vacuum and burst, unless impeded by a solidly robust and impermeable boundary, therefore killing any astronaut in seconds. At 39 km altitude, you have approximately 3.75 Torr. 3.75 Torr is the low vacuum or rough vacuum range. It still has a significant number of gas molecules, and is no comparison to the theoretical low pressure of Outer Space at 1×10-6 to <3×10-17 Torr 100 µPa to <3fPa.
I truly appreciate the work and due diligence. This was very informative. What struck me personally was this yummy clip!
Additionally, the 14.7 lbs. for every square inch pressure at the Earth’s surface is a function ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE, not GRAVITY, according to Physics. And at the highest altitudes this 14.7 lbs. for every square inch pressure reduces to virtually zero. Thus, without some form of containment around the Earth’s atmosphere, there is nothing to prevent the Earth’s atmosphere from expanding out into the vacuum void of Outer Space. To do so would be a violation of The Laws of Thermodynamics.
I was literally perusing this question in the last week......how could a pressurized sphere exist in a vacuum...it can't, additionally....the pressure gradient,of gravity was a factor would be greater in the upper regions,not less....that's its reverse of that proves gravity is not a factor....now for centripetal force.......uh,yeah.....
There is universal ignorance of electromagnetism by these zealots; the guy doesn't even know of the self-sorting properties of plasma to contain and produce density gradients in discernable layers around a spherical object in a vacuum:
And yes, the earth has multiple discernable layers of self-sorted low energy plasmas just like the SAFIRE project created; the SAFIRE reactor has high energy, glow mode plasmas which is the primary differentiation from earth's nigh invisible dark mode plasmas, but should the OPEN electrical environment within our solar system and outwards into the Perseus galactic arm change, earth's dark mode plasma shells can become glow or arc mode (God help us!) again with nary a moment's notice. I believe these layers were once visible in the past and encapsulated in such myths as "the 7 heavens" and "circles of the earth" etc.
JP- if you comprehended how PLASMA manifests via the 1st FOUR FORMATIVE ETHERS you would not be so confused. I find everyone who discusses Plasma without recognising the AETHER it is within has shallow thoughts so far, as if Plasma is separate entity, rather than intrinsic process.
If I have mis judged you & missed something I apologise, but here you seem to be being pedantic about something you are obviously intelligent about, yet not yet fully aware with ?
Containment. You got it. The Earth is contained within The Firmament. Just keep pursuing the logic of containment. Without containment, all pressure systems flow from high pressure to low. Thermodynamics 101.
What a load of tosh. The only things I can remotely agree with here are the fact that the moon landings are nothing like we have been lead to believe, and that the suits will become very hard to maneuver in when in a vacuum as they will puff up like a balloon. This is known from space walks that it will be an issue, and that's why the suits are are so bulky and have many rigid elements.
The talk about planets not being able to hold their atmospheres together is just fundamental misunderstandings related to physics.
Some things not mentioned, like light elements such as hydrogen and helium being able to escape from our atmosphere, and the fact that smaller bodies that don't have enough gravity or magnetism, like the moon, not being able to maintain an atmosphere, are all things that corroborate the standard view. I also don't understand how people so easily dismiss the awesome power of gravity. Just jump up and down! That force applies to the air around you too, and that's despite the earth spinning as fast as it does.
Not everything is a conspiracy, but I can understand why you might think so. Very few people have experienced, or will ever experience space travel, so it's much easier to fake than something closer to earth. Despite this, this theory is one you can safely ignore!
Oh and I should add that there is also a fundamental misconception about how pressures affect certain shapes. A tanker is designed to resist internal pressure, not external, so it gets crushed when you apply that pressure from the outside. Saying that you need inches of steel to withstand such pressures is just patently absurd. Even a typical rubber car tyre is at around 2 atmospheres, so there is twice as much pressure being held inside a tyre than would need to be resisted by a space suit. It's not hard to engineer, but if you try to move in such a suit, it will be like trying to move in an inflated Michelin man type suit, and this is harder than it looks.
In order to mitigate this though, the pressure inside space suits is also lowered, just like it is in planes. It's typically at only around 1/3 of atmospheric pressure. This means it also doesn't need to resist anywhere near 1 atmosphere of pressure in reality!
Just to close this out. 1 atmosphere is about 10m of water, a 1/3 of that is around 3.5m. It's not that much and nothing like what needs to be resisted when you are hundreds of thousands of meters underwater...
Let’s just say your “ perception of reality “ is quite different from mine. You should probably put down the hopem pipe, what sucks for you is the law of thermodynamics, reality vs perception. You can never refute the information provided in the article. You do not even have the intellectual honesty to the actually refute data presented. you are just speaking jibberish about the space suit, you bring zero facts to the table. Please, for your own sake, put down the pipe.
As, as far as I'm concerned, temperature has nothing to do with this argument because the environments are close to being a vacuum, and the main mechanisms for taking heat away (convection and conduction) have very little effect.
Pressure also doesn't affect the ability of animals to live in high or low pressure environments, mostly because they equalise the pressure within themselves, to the pressure outside.
Why Temperature Is Crucial in Pressure/Vacuum Dynamics
Gas Behavior: According to the ideal gas law
𝑃𝑉=𝑛𝑅𝑇, pressure 𝑃, volume 𝑉 , and temperature 𝑇
are interdependent. If temperature changes, pressure changes too—unless volume adjusts to compensate.
Density & Buoyancy: Temperature affects the density of gases and fluids. Warmer air is less dense, rising against 'gravity' ( a term I will use here but have objection with)—key in atmospheric dynamics, vacuum systems, and even symbolic interpretations of ascent and levitation.
Thermal Gradients: Temperature differences can drive pressure differentials, as seen in wind formation, convection currents, and shockwaves.
Material Response: In engineering systems, seals, membranes, and containers respond differently under vacuum depending on their temperature—some may warp or contract.
Life's Envelope thrives within narrow pressure and temperature ranges. The stability of biological processes hinges on maintaining specific thermodynamic conditions—just a few degrees off and protein structures fold improperly or fail to function.
So I think you are posing on this topic, maybe you're just here to muddy waters or bog down constructive discussion, or maybe you are a fanatic with a big bug up your backside ?
Hopefully not though ?, & here you can actually learn something beyond your aberrant compass of awareness & then maybe write a POST on it. As its very peculiar you would 'know' so much yet not compile it into a proper argument for an alternative view.
I think they are intelligent person who has fixed view that needs lubrication. Here we correct some mis-assumptions I hope, & they become potent mind able to fathom such deep matters.
Sometime admitting being in error is hardest thing to learn.
You must be some constipated idiot if you do not comprehend temperature influences on all you write. I will not waste time of such moronic poseur games. You are just here to be TIME VAMPIRE BORE ?
FACT= Temperature often plays a foundational role in how pressure and vacuum differentials behave
According to your academic Bible of science- from 55-65 miles above Earth surface temperature increase from approx. -100'C to +100' C & keeps increasing up to 3,000'C without diminishment.
Now apply all the crud you witter here to the TIDES OF AETHER the Earth works with (& you are probably ignorant of) to the nature of PLASMA & sheathing.
Then when you are adult enough to debate the matter in an informed way you can get back to me.
........ I'm a time vampire bore... Right... We'll at least I know I'm not speaking to an AI, so that's nice.
Anyway, space suits also only need to tolerate temperatures between -200 to plus 2-300 degrees Celsius. Because they won't be in places where they will experience temperatures outside of that range (including on the moon).
I think my first comment makes it clear that we are being lied to about the Apollo missions, but this doesn't make this drivel, or your comments make any more sense sadly. There are much more scientifically sound ways to debunk travel into space and specifically the Apollo missions.
But, But, But We went to the Moon!!! You have to believe it, you must believe it because the Government said you had to believe it! Just like 911, and all the other made up crap that they say we must believe! It's amazing what Hollywood and the Government/CIA can do to make us believe in their BS.
I beginning to think that they absolutely want us to know, yet at the same time they want us to know we must pretend to not know. They are mind Fuc$er’s!
Bingo! Brilliant speculation! 🤩 I read your thoughts again 🤣
Gaslighting is a primary aphrodisiac
These international criminals and royal and noble crime bloodlines are threatening society with more fake epidemics, weaponized forced vaccinations, wars based on lies, civil war, world war, martial law, and genocides. They are attacking society with secret societies, organized crime, corporate fraud, and electronic weapons. These bloodlines spread plagues and have been doing that for hundreds of years. These families are behind all the major wars including World War I and World War II. When real people stand up to tyrants like them they infiltrate opposition such as the American Revolutionary War which was hijacked by Freemasons. These criminals collectively have trillions of dollars in offshore accounts in Switzerland, Liechtenstein, and Luxembourg and they are controlling the Bank for International Settlements. They extort governments and people and make hundreds of billions per year through organized crime. They torment people with electronic weapons. The entire electronic grid has been weaponized with neuro-bio hacking programs. They finance continual lying in society through the media and entertainment. Their primary tactics are lying, making false accusations against people who expose them, and using phony arrogance to appear like they are in control at all times.
https://worldcrimesyndicate.blogspot.com/2020/05/leadership-of-global-mafia.html
This is excellent empirical evidence! I always take GOD’s word as the Standard to test science. Since we live under an atheistic science community, the data we see will always be contrary to scripture, therefore we can trust that whatever we are told by mainstream Scientism, we can take the opposite as gospel truth! Plain and simple.
🎯
May i add another bullseye !
How is this countered? What is the mental gymnastics needed for one to continue to beLIEve. There’s no way to refute, this topic. I haul tanker trailers & am aware of the vacuum effect explosion, but never want to see it in person. First I am hearing this notion & fully comprehend there is not a rebuttal.
The rebuttal is simple. The article deploys a grossly flawed assumption (straw man, really): there is no "wall" between the atmosphere and the vacuum of outer space.
Being a dumbass, guy does not know or care about the self-sorting properties of PLASMA DOUBLE LAYERS in the atmosphere. It is the electromagetically low energy layers of earth's dark mode plasma layers which constrain the atmosphere and isolate it from the surrounding vacuum as ably demonstrated in the SAFIRE vacuum plasma experiments.
Vacuum implosion strawman rebutted. Cheers.
This may provide you with a little more background information on your theory.
https://gregorylessinggarrett.substack.com/p/the-safire-project-and-the-earths
And just what constrains the spherical concentric shells of the SAFIRE apparatus's atmosphere from exploding outwards into the vacuum of the chamber? There's no 'wall' between the plasma and the vacuum (there is only containment between the vacuum and earth atmosphere). Its only hydrogen gas electrified into a plasma state, separated into visible double layers, self-sorted, and held in place by the laws of electromagnetism.
Now I know that SAFIRE has several theoretical flaws which makes it unsuitable as a true analogue to earth or the sun: SAFIRE's orb was an anode, whereas earth and the sun are electrically cathodes (Juergens was wrong on this point), so a copper orb cathode encased with a steel anode would have been more accurate representation of our solar system's dynamics. Sadly we will never see any experiment reversing SAFIRE's polarity despite our repeated requests.
Second, the entire apparatus is encased, an unfortunate necessity of terrestrial vacuum research, whereas the solar system is open and free to all electronmagnetic particle movement (e.g. solar wind, cosmic rays). The only actual space vacuum research I am aware of is that done by the Russians on ISS, and they certainly were not testing the SAFIRE device in open space, which is the next necessary step: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=R4Z_-WbDs4U
Thirdly, SAFIRE's orb has no magnetic field, unlike earth or the sun. This may result in changes to the shape of the SAFIRE orb's hydrogen plasma atmosphere.
Fourth, no SAFIRE experiments have utilised earth minerals (e.g. granite) as the cathode orb, nor standard earth air (N2 O2 Ar He H2 CO2) to see what might happen with spherical atmospheric formation in a vacuum. I doubt any such experiments will occur despite our requests for them.
But those significant points aside, it is still a practical demonstration that a sphere can form a layered plasma atmosphere in a vacuum without any outward 'explosion' of the atmosphere against the vacuum. The electromagnetic properties of the hydrogen plasma are enough to retain its spherical shape, layering and overall electrical isolation from the surrounding vacuum. And because plasma physics is unbiquitous across the entire universe at every scale, micro to macro, they can apply equally to planetary atmospheres as much as to SAFIRE's star simulation.
It may just be that your precious raqi'a is the same layered atmospheric plasma phenomenon that once upon a time in ancient memory was previously visible in the sky and resembled a solid curved disc or upturned bowl. That same plasma layer(s) still exists now, only in dark mode rather than glow, because of catastrophic alterations of earth's electrical environs in the millennia between then and now.
https://gregorylessinggarrett.substack.com/p/questions-comments-and-concerns-regarding
I like you thinking on this.
None of us know how accurate these ideas are, but they are certainly inspiring for bigger thoughts.
What an a
extraordinary article it makes total sense My intuition is all I have as I am not a scientist
Before being a TV producer I never believed the moon landing was real I also wondered for many years about the technology of space suits gravity the atmosphere and the dangers of our irresponsible deranged Deep State psychopaths that are intent on destroying our beautiful planet and humanity and every living thing that God created including our Ozone layer
I like your view, but still, you are missing basics.
A plasma layer does exist, many of them do. How they exist at such distance from Earth is seemingly unknown, as no one has get higher than about 50 miles from surface (from what proof is available). Text books claim the atmosphere simply diffuses, but we do not know for sure, or know what plasma sheaths are involved.
Now, what you miss is this- any Plasma manifold/sheathing etc that can contain the pressure differentials explained above would be in effect a SOLID WALL to particles not of a very specific resonance. It would be AKIN to the glass dome idea (that is probably ridiculous, but a PLASMA/ETHERIC dome is not so ridiculous, & in fact very alluring possibility. I do not claim any dome is there, as I do not claim to know for sure anything I have not experienced, but still, it is POTENTIAL that can be considered.
I will speculate though , that the PLASMA (which is first stage of manifest FORMATIVE ETHERS ) COULD BE so concentrated (ie charged - not compressed per se) as to be in effect a zone of SLOW TIME . ie it would take many years of travel to get through just a few meters of PLASMA (or whatever form PLASMAs adopt in such 'alien' environments' . In effect, outer space may be only a relatively tiny space around us , but is always EFFECTIVLY almost INFINITE to our current bodily form.
This is very exciting arena for speculation & experiment, & I have written a paper on such & begun serialising it on my pages, if you care to consider it, I would very much enjoy reading what you think. Thank you.
Nobody knows for sure the composition of The Firmament. I suspect it has many layers and a plasma layer is highly likely, along with quasi vitreous and crystalline layers. It's all speculation.
Yes , yet - I doubt 'solid' things exist there as we perceive on earth, the 'crystal' may be the thing itself in otherwords- ie we are within it.
I am awaiting your reaction to my cosmology paper, at the moment I do not think you are totally serious about this topic, sadly.
I have no optimism for these types of investigation if such work is ignored, or treated like the typical excrement being deposited all over social platforms. Also to ignore such works implies that they will never be popular or inspire the means to mitigate the stupidity & clichés we are all being drowned in.
Only a few years ago (pre ConVD) works like this would have been praised as revolutionary synthesis, so I am very concerned what is happening with peoples low awareness & lack of inner fire.
You wrote a Cosmology paper?
Myself with best friends in UK. It is on my home page with 1st 4 parts- it is all written but I am sad at lack of interactions & awareness, so far. I may publish more after outing massive SHILL TEAM games now confirmed.
Resonant Field Cosmology: A Comparative Framework of Aetheric Dynamics and Symbolic Topology in Earth-Based and Plasma-Environ Systems
here is link for quick access- part TWO is best bit for beginners maybe?
https://substack.com/home/post/p-168701689
Operation fish bowl worth checking out
Equally as interesting, to a lay person. This is as much gray matter as I can put forth on this subject, the possibilities are infinite ;-)
JP, its easy to drop a comment on the contrary to the article, but how about some supporting docs to enlighten us?
https://gregorylessinggarrett.substack.com/p/the-safire-project-and-the-earths
https://safireproject.com/movies/presentations.html
So the sun, yes, very interesting. But maybe I'm not looking deep enough but where is the evidence for the earth system ?
Same plasma physics, lower energy scales in earth's own plasma sheath:
https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.155002
"Authorisation required" article is unreadable minus the obvious headline.
Is that what makes water that always finds it level bend and curve around a spinning BAAL?
What a great and detailed piece, an often overlooked aspect of the whole farce during the cold war.
Many people mentioned it in the past, but never so in depth & well presented as here.
The inversion is very wise as is the idea that things in space would be more rapid due to lack of friction etc.... so the 'under water/ slow motion' footage is a massive give away & error opposing academic claims of topology & environment.
Very scholarly article... my geek husband would love it! My only comment is: how come nobody mentioned the reflection on the space helmet... you know, the shadow of a regular person standing in a studio with all the paraphernalia around?? Or is that old hat by now? LOL
Yes Paula you are right I did zoom on that and see the cameraman shadow with no suit and that shadow of a pole going the wrong way too! Very interesting thank you for mentioning that.
Heat transfer without convection from a 98F body in a space suit to the 250F lunar surface. They never showed how they prevented heat from building up in the space suits. One would think they would try to prove that first before ridiculing the Moon Landing deniers.
Also, the temperature of 'near space' (just outside Earth atmosphere) are alleged to be 3,000'C - the same (at one time in text books) for the surface of the Sun.
The zone of greatest interest is allegedly between 55- 65 miles above surface, as there the temperature goes from -100'C to + 100'c in 10 miles !!!
I can not confirm this of course, but it is intriguing.
Also the distances & temperatures have changed since the 1970's texts books , but not by a great deal.
We're told that the almighty "gravity" keeps everything in its place and that even clouds are stapled to the surface of a sphere spinning at about 1000mph. I don't know how free floating cumuli manage to keep up but they do. Amazing. And, yet, we're also TOLD incessantly that mankind can now go to Mars! Woo woo! Nevermind that moon next door where nobody has supposedly set foot in the past fifty years. Move along now. Nothing to ponder too deeply now.
Yes! Just close your eyes & you too can go to mars with imagination.
😁😄
There is no outer space, it’s all been indoctrinated to us believing in a globe earth . So called space ships splash into the ocean away from prying eyes because they can’t punch a hole in the firmament. Wake up and be smart.
How much less pressure is there at 400 km altitude of ISS vs. the stratosphere air balloon jumper at 39 km altitude? The balloon guy had a space suit that appeared to work.
With the theoretical low pressure of Outer Space at 1×10-6 to <3×10-17 Torr 100 µPa to <3fPa, any pressure in a spacesuit would naturally expand outwards to fill any available volume in the surrounding vacuum and burst, unless impeded by a solidly robust and impermeable boundary, therefore killing any astronaut in seconds. At 39 km altitude, you have approximately 3.75 Torr. 3.75 Torr is the low vacuum or rough vacuum range. It still has a significant number of gas molecules, and is no comparison to the theoretical low pressure of Outer Space at 1×10-6 to <3×10-17 Torr 100 µPa to <3fPa.
Excellent read. I got the gist of it. Wow eh. I knew the moon landing was a hoax.
I truly appreciate the work and due diligence. This was very informative. What struck me personally was this yummy clip!
Additionally, the 14.7 lbs. for every square inch pressure at the Earth’s surface is a function ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE, not GRAVITY, according to Physics. And at the highest altitudes this 14.7 lbs. for every square inch pressure reduces to virtually zero. Thus, without some form of containment around the Earth’s atmosphere, there is nothing to prevent the Earth’s atmosphere from expanding out into the vacuum void of Outer Space. To do so would be a violation of The Laws of Thermodynamics.
Thx for sharing!
I was literally perusing this question in the last week......how could a pressurized sphere exist in a vacuum...it can't, additionally....the pressure gradient,of gravity was a factor would be greater in the upper regions,not less....that's its reverse of that proves gravity is not a factor....now for centripetal force.......uh,yeah.....
awesome article....thanks!...
I’m just going to assume this is a troll post, because no one could be this ignorant about physics.
About as ignorant as people thinking a suit with no sealed cuffs (sleeve to gloves) is going to keep an astronaut safe in space.
There is universal ignorance of electromagnetism by these zealots; the guy doesn't even know of the self-sorting properties of plasma to contain and produce density gradients in discernable layers around a spherical object in a vacuum:
https://safireproject.com/science/phase-three.html
And yes, the earth has multiple discernable layers of self-sorted low energy plasmas just like the SAFIRE project created; the SAFIRE reactor has high energy, glow mode plasmas which is the primary differentiation from earth's nigh invisible dark mode plasmas, but should the OPEN electrical environment within our solar system and outwards into the Perseus galactic arm change, earth's dark mode plasma shells can become glow or arc mode (God help us!) again with nary a moment's notice. I believe these layers were once visible in the past and encapsulated in such myths as "the 7 heavens" and "circles of the earth" etc.
https://gregorylessinggarrett.substack.com/p/the-safire-project-and-the-earths
JP- if you comprehended how PLASMA manifests via the 1st FOUR FORMATIVE ETHERS you would not be so confused. I find everyone who discusses Plasma without recognising the AETHER it is within has shallow thoughts so far, as if Plasma is separate entity, rather than intrinsic process.
If I have mis judged you & missed something I apologise, but here you seem to be being pedantic about something you are obviously intelligent about, yet not yet fully aware with ?
Containment. You got it. The Earth is contained within The Firmament. Just keep pursuing the logic of containment. Without containment, all pressure systems flow from high pressure to low. Thermodynamics 101.
HVAC guy here,thermodynamics is what I do........lol.....
What a load of tosh. The only things I can remotely agree with here are the fact that the moon landings are nothing like we have been lead to believe, and that the suits will become very hard to maneuver in when in a vacuum as they will puff up like a balloon. This is known from space walks that it will be an issue, and that's why the suits are are so bulky and have many rigid elements.
The talk about planets not being able to hold their atmospheres together is just fundamental misunderstandings related to physics.
Some things not mentioned, like light elements such as hydrogen and helium being able to escape from our atmosphere, and the fact that smaller bodies that don't have enough gravity or magnetism, like the moon, not being able to maintain an atmosphere, are all things that corroborate the standard view. I also don't understand how people so easily dismiss the awesome power of gravity. Just jump up and down! That force applies to the air around you too, and that's despite the earth spinning as fast as it does.
Not everything is a conspiracy, but I can understand why you might think so. Very few people have experienced, or will ever experience space travel, so it's much easier to fake than something closer to earth. Despite this, this theory is one you can safely ignore!
Oh and I should add that there is also a fundamental misconception about how pressures affect certain shapes. A tanker is designed to resist internal pressure, not external, so it gets crushed when you apply that pressure from the outside. Saying that you need inches of steel to withstand such pressures is just patently absurd. Even a typical rubber car tyre is at around 2 atmospheres, so there is twice as much pressure being held inside a tyre than would need to be resisted by a space suit. It's not hard to engineer, but if you try to move in such a suit, it will be like trying to move in an inflated Michelin man type suit, and this is harder than it looks.
In order to mitigate this though, the pressure inside space suits is also lowered, just like it is in planes. It's typically at only around 1/3 of atmospheric pressure. This means it also doesn't need to resist anywhere near 1 atmosphere of pressure in reality!
Just to close this out. 1 atmosphere is about 10m of water, a 1/3 of that is around 3.5m. It's not that much and nothing like what needs to be resisted when you are hundreds of thousands of meters underwater...
Let’s just say your “ perception of reality “ is quite different from mine. You should probably put down the hopem pipe, what sucks for you is the law of thermodynamics, reality vs perception. You can never refute the information provided in the article. You do not even have the intellectual honesty to the actually refute data presented. you are just speaking jibberish about the space suit, you bring zero facts to the table. Please, for your own sake, put down the pipe.
You are so up yourself on this that you have not even factored temperature into your child-like view.
I suggest you change your name because you are far from being perceptive on this topic, & seem crippled with conformist indoctrinations.
For example - pressure is very important & the ergonomics of deep sea fish & high altitude insects/ spiders is in contradiction to your claims here.
Please explain yourself.
As, as far as I'm concerned, temperature has nothing to do with this argument because the environments are close to being a vacuum, and the main mechanisms for taking heat away (convection and conduction) have very little effect.
Pressure also doesn't affect the ability of animals to live in high or low pressure environments, mostly because they equalise the pressure within themselves, to the pressure outside.
Why Temperature Is Crucial in Pressure/Vacuum Dynamics
Gas Behavior: According to the ideal gas law
𝑃𝑉=𝑛𝑅𝑇, pressure 𝑃, volume 𝑉 , and temperature 𝑇
are interdependent. If temperature changes, pressure changes too—unless volume adjusts to compensate.
Density & Buoyancy: Temperature affects the density of gases and fluids. Warmer air is less dense, rising against 'gravity' ( a term I will use here but have objection with)—key in atmospheric dynamics, vacuum systems, and even symbolic interpretations of ascent and levitation.
Thermal Gradients: Temperature differences can drive pressure differentials, as seen in wind formation, convection currents, and shockwaves.
Material Response: In engineering systems, seals, membranes, and containers respond differently under vacuum depending on their temperature—some may warp or contract.
Life's Envelope thrives within narrow pressure and temperature ranges. The stability of biological processes hinges on maintaining specific thermodynamic conditions—just a few degrees off and protein structures fold improperly or fail to function.
So I think you are posing on this topic, maybe you're just here to muddy waters or bog down constructive discussion, or maybe you are a fanatic with a big bug up your backside ?
Hopefully not though ?, & here you can actually learn something beyond your aberrant compass of awareness & then maybe write a POST on it. As its very peculiar you would 'know' so much yet not compile it into a proper argument for an alternative view.
I think they are intelligent person who has fixed view that needs lubrication. Here we correct some mis-assumptions I hope, & they become potent mind able to fathom such deep matters.
Sometime admitting being in error is hardest thing to learn.
You must be some constipated idiot if you do not comprehend temperature influences on all you write. I will not waste time of such moronic poseur games. You are just here to be TIME VAMPIRE BORE ?
FACT= Temperature often plays a foundational role in how pressure and vacuum differentials behave
According to your academic Bible of science- from 55-65 miles above Earth surface temperature increase from approx. -100'C to +100' C & keeps increasing up to 3,000'C without diminishment.
Now apply all the crud you witter here to the TIDES OF AETHER the Earth works with (& you are probably ignorant of) to the nature of PLASMA & sheathing.
Then when you are adult enough to debate the matter in an informed way you can get back to me.
........ I'm a time vampire bore... Right... We'll at least I know I'm not speaking to an AI, so that's nice.
Anyway, space suits also only need to tolerate temperatures between -200 to plus 2-300 degrees Celsius. Because they won't be in places where they will experience temperatures outside of that range (including on the moon).
I think my first comment makes it clear that we are being lied to about the Apollo missions, but this doesn't make this drivel, or your comments make any more sense sadly. There are much more scientifically sound ways to debunk travel into space and specifically the Apollo missions.
Thank you for polite manner,
I apologise I call you potential Time Vampire Bore-
I deal with too many trolls & it effect my patience!
😃😄
It makes sense to me, but I obviously know more than you about the topic.
What rubber seals or even metals survive 3,000'C temperature ?!
🙄😂
I think you haven't thought this through properly.
But I appreciate your polite , restrained discourse & we can respect each other even when in disagreement,
Would be very interested to know the precise location on Earth where water hundreds of thousands of meters deep is found...
Ooops typo, should have been hundreds OR thousands of meters! Thanks for the spot
You are Gravity fanatic who is ignorant of other genuine 'forces' then.
Many people experienced space travel- & they never have to leave the soil they live on.
NASA are NAGA perverts of Theater Cults & Hixoss liars- if you believe them you are a lost soul, the rest of us can safely ignore.
Most excellent piece - thank you!!