9 Comments

Merry Christmas to you!! I really appreciate your articles and look forward to reading them.

Expand full comment

The only claim helocentrism has re: gravity, is that all thing are pulled “IN” towards the center of the presupposed sphere earth. Any description of a “DOWNWARD” vector must be made with respect to a horizontal plane of reference. (Down, being 90° perpendicular to a horizontal plane.) There are no horizontal panes on a sphere either geometrically or observationally (meaning we do not observe sphericity or curvature at ALL. Ever.)

All elevations noted in your chart, are MEASURED with respect to their distance above or below sea LEVEL.

Actually... to even try to logically describe water moving up and over a sphere is a paradox.

Expand full comment

Well, what a year of discovery and wonder,I look forward to another 😁🙏🧐

Love the elevation graphic 😁👍hmmm.😂

Merry Christmas, Gregory,

fine, fine and extraordinary work.

Cheers,

Michael.

Expand full comment

Always important to bring up facts that can’t be disputed. This is a great example. The Mississippi River as well. Polaris also proves we are not spinning, objects out to sea seen with zoom cameras over supposed curve, circular star trails on Timelapse, lasers and mirrors proving bodies of water are level, infrared photography revealing mountains over 300 miles away, high altitude balloons revealing horizon never dips but lays flat and horizon always meets the eyes, on and on the empirical evidence keeps piling up as our technology and awareness blow this deception off the flat earth. I find the rockets scraping the watery firmament most beautiful and solid, hard, I mean obvious proof of the Bible speaking FACTS that scientism despises. Keep up the good work exposing this satanic globe lie!

Expand full comment

What keeps the sea level?

Expand full comment

Water seems to mimic a solid on the surface. To me it resembles mercury. I cant recall the term for it, but maybe all the molecules are fond of hugging each other? :)

Expand full comment

The point is, “Why do you call north ‘uP’? UP should be the distance from a lower point [ elevation ] not an imaginary point on a map [ simulation ].

Expand full comment

Playing devil’s advocate here but in the last image showing the elevation levels of the beginning and end of the Nile, doesn’t it stand to reason that if the beginning is so high compared to the destination, direction wouldn’t matter, north or south? If water seeks it’s level, it must flow north. The only outlet is the Mediterranean. If there was no outlet, of course it would be a lake and be level, so Im conflicted about the elevation aspect. I cant make it make sense otherwise. If it has somewhere to empty and seeks it’s level, that is where I think it would go. Shrug.

I don’t find this topic to matter much in my salvation, but it sure is interesting to investigate!

Expand full comment

Also the Amazon river flows left to right which means the Americas are not in the position we are told they are but inverted. The Marcador lines were constructed to be a deception of this. Definetely we are inside a giant bowl like a crater of a 1000x bigger planet. So I agree with the assessment 100%

Expand full comment