Thanks to Compartmentalization and a “Need to Know Basis,” it is Easy to Fool Millions of Scientists Regarding Space Flight

It is really not that difficult to trick millions of scientists into believing that their technology is traveling to Outer Space. It is not as though they were in on any kind of deception, themselves. They were simply doing their jobs in a compartmentalized fashion, and on a “need to know basis,” as most military operations are conducted. Only a very few at the top tier have to be in on any kind of deception to make it all work, as any government knows. Each technician and scientist oversees his tiny contribution to the comprehensive mission, with a combination of technocratic and bureaucratic overlords controlling the flow of vital information, as well as monitoring and steering where all these subtextual contributions go and how they fit in to the overall final design.

Another issue remains that many have debated about over the years. How did the top tier controllers at NASA, who were only a small handful of Freemasons, deceive Mission Control during the alleged Apollo Missions? Surely, Mission Control would realize that The Moon Missions were being faked if they were, right?

Wrong.

And here is why:

NASA ran many months of practice and training exercises in the Arizona desert and Pinewood Movie Studios for The Apollo Mission, and saved all that telemetry data, as well as any footage of training shot at ground-based movie studios where they had admittingly simulated the Moon’s surface. Additionally, they had filmed Astronauts jumping up and down on tethers in half speed to create the illusion of Moon walking buoyancy. During the actual Apollo broadcast of the mission, all they did was feed all that telemetry data and fake Moon footage to the consoles at Mission Control, as well as televising the whole event to the world. And nobody could distinguish between what was training exercise data and what was supposed to be the real event, complete with voice overs and slick narration.

It was all a movie production. And this is all NASA does…movie production using very expensive rocket props. This is why Werner Von Braun worked so closely with Walt Disney and his fantasy movie making studios for so many years. In other words, in a sense, we were watching the making of Ron Howard’s, Apollo 13 in 1969…not an actual Moon Mission. But instead of Ron Howard’s film, with Tom Hanks, Kevin Bacon, and Bill Paxton, the actors in the NASA Apollo 13 movie were Freemasons, Jim Lovell, John Swigert, and Fred Haise.

The “live feed” that Mission Control monitored during what was supposed to be the Apollo 13 Live Mission matched exactly with everything they had been monitoring for many months during NASA training exercises on The Earth’s surface, and so, there was no reason to suspect that during the “live event” anything was out of the ordinary. Then, all they did from the top down, in terms of chain of command, is add the extra footage of training shot at ground-based movie studios where they had simulated The Moon’s surface, as well as footage of Astronauts jumping up and down at half speed with voice overs and live narration, etc…Fooling millions with Hollywood movie making techniques is not difficult at all. Nobody can verify anything since it all supposed to be occurring in Outer Space. And so, all they needed to do is show film footage of whatever narrative they wanted to project.

It was easy to pull off.

And Stanley Kubrick’s infamous involvement in the Moon Mission production  made it all the more easy. But that’s another highly controversial story.

Everyone was not in on the deception because everyone did not need to be. NASA was compartmentalized, exactly how NAZI Germany compartmentalized their various departments on a “need to know basis”. Given that NASA was largely created from the ground up from Operation Paperclip NAZI scientists, this is no surprise.

The Telemetry Data Feed to Mission Control During The “Live Event”:

And so, the telemetry data feed that Mission Control received was simply pre-existing training and telemetry data. NASA’s telemetry data was supposed to be the data that is sent back to NASA from a spacecraft during its mission. This data was then said to be used to monitor the spacecraft’s performance, reflect the vital signs of the Astronauts, and to make sure that it was on track. And so, the question concerning how only a hand-full of top Masonic officials were able to fool Mission Control and the world, regarding the fake Moon Missions, is easily answered.

I would tell you more about it, but its classified, and on a “need to know basis”.

Wink!

NASA Claims:

“For each lunar landing mission, a camera was also placed inside the Apollo Lunar Module (LM) descent stage's modularized equipment stowage assembly (MESA). Positioning the camera in the MESA made it possible to telecast the astronauts' first steps as they climbed down the LM's ladder at the start of a mission's first moonwalk/EVA. Afterwards, the camera would be detached from its mount in the MESA, mounted on a tripod and carried away from the LM to show the EVA's progress; or, mounted on a Lunar Roving Vehicle (LRV), where it could be remotely controlled from Mission Control on Earth.”

Do you buy it?

I don’t, given the technology in 1969.

It makes more sense that Stanley Kubrick filmed it from the surface of the Pinewood Studio Moon set. In 1935, millionaire Methodist and flour magnate J. Arthur Rank (1888–1972) went into partnership with Boot and they transformed the estate into a film studio. Boot based designs for the studio complex on the latest ideas being employed by film studios in Hollywood, California. Boot named the new studio Pinewood because "of the number of trees which grow there and because it seemed to suggest something of the American film centre in its second syllable".

Pinewood Studios:

Additionally, your smart phone will do over 100,000 times the number of computations per second that the Lunar Module's computer could do. It was a very slow, primitive computer, at approximately 10 KB of memory, and hardly capable of rendering even a kitty cat image on a computer screen, let alone performing the complex calculations and work flow necessary to operate a Lunar Modul or remote camera on The Moon.

Also, Wi-Fi communication today is a millions time more advanced than anything NASA had in 1969, and yet I lose my cell signal if I go through a tunnel.

And yet, NASA is claiming almost zero latency two-way communication between Earth and The Moon at an alleged 294,000 miles!!! That’s communication through 7 layers of Earth atmosphere and then hundreds of thousands of miles of fictional Outer Space, including The Van Allen Radiation Belts.

Yeah, right…

President Richard Nixon Calling The Moon on a Landline in 1969…Make Sense?

NASA Claims This:

“Nixon spoke on a telephone which was routed through the wire and microwave links of the day until it reached a Manned Spaceflight Communications Network ground station where it was modulated onto s-band radio and transmitted to the Moon. The Van Allen belts (plural) were not an impediment.”

The technical impossibility of this in 1969, not to mention their absurd disregard for the Van Allen Radiation Belts, is both hilarious and nonsensical. At best, such a routing structure would create incredible latency problems, signal repeater and relay delays, and reception dissonance.  

Quote From Wagging The Moondoggie: Part I: The Romanticized Nostalgia of The Apollo Missions

(By Dave McGowan, October 1, 2009)

Apollo 12 Mission Image of Lunar Surface Near Lunar Module. This Piece of Junk Made of Curtain Rods. Paper Machē, and Tin Foil Allegedly Withstood the Harsh Lunar Surface. This is the Kind of Junk That a High School Drama Department Makes While Drunk:

NASA Faking Space For Decades:

Artists used paintbrushes and airbrushes to recreate the lunar surface on each of the four models comprising the LOLA simulator. Project LOLA or Lunar Orbit and Landing Approach was a simulator built at Langley to study problems related to landing on the lunar surface. It was a complex project that cost nearly $2 million dollars:

Dave McGowan:

“Anyway, a whole lot of people are extremely reluctant to give up their belief in the success of the Apollo missions. A lot of people, in fact, pretty much shut down at the mere mention of the Moon landings being faked, refusing to even consider the possibility (Facebook, by the way, is definitely not the best place to promote the notion that the landings were faked, in case anyone was wondering). And yet there are some among the True Believers who will allow that, though they firmly believe that we did indeed land on the Moon, they would have understood if it had been a hoax. Given the climate of the times, with Cold War tensions simmering and anxious Americans looking for some sign that their country was still dominant and not technologically inferior to the Soviets, it could be excused if NASA had duped the world.

Such sentiments made me realize that the Moon landing lie is somewhat unique among the big lies told to the American people in that it was, in the grand scheme of things, a relatively benign lie, and one that could be easily spun. Admitting that the landings were faked would not have nearly the same impact as, say, admitting to mass murdering 3,000 Americans and destroying billions of dollars’ worth of real estate and then using that crime as a pretext to wage two illegal wars and strip away civil, legal and privacy rights.

And yet, despite the fact that it was a relatively benign lie, there is a tremendous reluctance among the American people to let go of the notion that we sent men to the Moon. There are a couple of reasons for that, one of them being that there is a romanticized notion that those were great years – years when one was proud to be an American. And in this day and age, people need that kind of romanticized nostalgia to cling to.

The Moon Landings Hoax by Taboo Conspiracy:

But that (romanticized nostalgia) is not the main reason that people cling so tenaciously, often even angrily, to what is essentially the adult version of Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, and the Tooth Fairy. What primarily motivates them is fear. But it is not the lie itself that scares people; it is what that lie says about the world around us and how it really functions. For if NASA was able to pull off such an outrageous hoax before the entire world, and then keep that lie in place for four decades, what does that say about the control of the information we receive? What does that say about the media, and the scientific community, and the educational community, and all the other institutions we depend on to tell us the truth? What does that say about the very nature of the world we live in?

That is what scares the hell out of people and prevents them from even considering the possibility that they could have been so thoroughly duped. It’s not being lied to about the Moon landings that people have a problem with, it is the realization that comes with that revelation: if they could lie about that, they could lie about anything.”

                                                                                 --Dave McGowan, October 1, 2009