The Final Proof of an Eternal Creator: The Emergent Universe, The Conservation of Energy and Mass, and Making a Fetish of Physics
To assert that The Cosmos is eternal and never began to exist, but rather, always was, is making a metaphysical and epistemological error. This is the very same error that the Luciferian Occult have made in claiming that The Cosmos is a conscious being that had no beginning or end but rather fashioned itself FROM itself, but with no evidence for the claim since, by definition, the natural world must have a supernatural antecedent in order to obey the laws of logic that Mankind has been bequeathed with. The word, “super”, merely means “above,” “over,” or “beyond. The term, “Supernatural”, simply refers to a force that must exist outside, or transcendent, to the natural world by virtue of the fact that in order to initiate that which is natural, something supernatural must have existed which exists as The Necessary Ground of Being for all that is in the natural existence, if we are to obey the laws of logic as they are applied within the domain of scientific inquiry.
Additionally, in Theism, God is defined as Eternal and as the creator of Space-Time, and is, as such, a-temporal (i.e., Beyond Time) and not bound by the Space-Time constraints that God thus created. There can be no “before God”, or “Where did God come from?” under this Ontological definition. “Before” requires Time, and “where” requires Space, and God, being the author both Time and Space, by this definition, is not bound by them. What Atheists have done is attempt to insert The Cosmos as the eternal author of a paradoxically self-created Space-Time in order to eliminate the need for a Creator, which is, of course, a scientifically incoherent claim.
The Emergent Universe scenario has been developed in Einstein-Gauss Bonnet (EGB) theory. The Universe is chosen as a homogeneous and isotropic, Alexander Friedmann, Georges Lemaître, Howard P. Robertson and Arthur Geoffrey Walker (FLRW) model and the matter in the universe has two components:
1. The first one is a perfect fluid with a barotropic equation of state p = ωρ (ω, a constant).
2. And the other component is a real or phantom (or tachyonic) scalar field.
Various possibilities for the existence of the emergent scenario have been discussed in the cannons of modern Cosmological Astrophysics. In a zealous struggle to avoid the notion of a Big Bang Singularity, which would point to a finite Universe, with its 14.5 billion years old signature, Cosmologists have been working around the clock on mathematical equations and spurious conjectures to redefine the Universe as eternal and self-causing, or as they like to say, “Emergent”.
The idea of an Eternal Creator has been the agonizing thorn in the side of modern Astrophysics because if the Universe is finite, with a beginning called The Big Bang, then it is inescapable to deny it had a Creator. Universes do not just create themselves. The idea of a CAUSE is inescapable.
No matter how much the Scientism Priests of modern Physics tried to apply Sophistry into their Ontological arguments by stating that “The Universe does not require any extra Creator for it to exist.”, or by accusing Theists of inserting a “God of the Gaps” explanation for Creation into the equation, it did nothing to explain the existence of The Cosmos. Neither do blanket statements like “The Universe does not need a God.” etc... help their case.
These shills of modern science could not escape the supreme logic that the Theist was constantly confronting them with…the logic that:
“Something does not come from nothing. If the Universe is 14.5 billion years old, as you say, then it had to have had a Creator to bring it into existence and this Creator must be Eternal to satisfy the Laws of Conservation of Energy and Mass. And this Creator cannot create, in itself, and that is by your own laws of physics.”
And so by their very own Laws of Physics, and from their very own model, they failed to explain the existence of life. Nevertheless, in Faith, they forged on.
However, the Theistic argument for a Creator was without any contradictions in science, philosophy, theology, metaphysics, physics, or rational thought. It was airtight. The logic was riveting. No physicist could dance his way out of it. They even tried to apply infinite regress paradoxes, which states that an infinite series of entities governed by a recursive principle determines how each entity in the series depends on or is produced by its predecessor, to the Theistic Creator Model, but failed. They were forced to admit that The Creator of Space and Time cannot be held to the regress of Time, since this Creator created Time, itself, by the Theist model. And without Time, what could be before? Correct, nothing could be before, and so SOMETHING must have been in existence prior to create Space and Time, and that something had all the attributes and properties of Eternality. This was the Theistic definition of God all along. The physicist had proven God’s existence. The Scientism Priests were at a loss and saw they had lost the game. The Theists were right. God must be.
The Atheist Scientists were was caught in the following dilemma:
Does he deny an Eternal God and violate his own Laws of The Conservation of Energy and Matter, (Matter can neither be created or destroyed) where something cannot come from nothing, but rather, something had to always ETERNALLY have been....which is the definition of God?
One attempt to save the day was the quantum proposition that particles are constantly “popping in an out of existence”. This was a way of saying, “Hey, we were wrong about the Laws of the Conservation of Energy and Matter and it appears somethings do come from nothing and Energy and Matter can be created and destroyed, in a manner of speaking.” With this assertion, they could claim that the Universe merely “popped” into existence spontaneously from its own emergent properties and The Big Bang model would sufficiently work then.
Again, this theory was never supported by anything but speculative mathematics, and explained away with Holographic Universe theory (David Bohm and Michael Talbot)) with the idea that quantum particles, quantized at the Plank Scale, merely revealed themselves in the “Explicate Order” of the measurable Universe, and then returned or “hid” at the “Implicate Order” of subterranean hierarchies...kind of like tree roots that cannot be seen because they are beneath the ground, as an analogy.
And so, Atheistic Science re-grouped, licked its wounds, and looked into Eastern mystical traditions for new models to triumph with. This eventually led to uncovering various ancient Cosmological models from the Hermetic traditions of Egypt and the Lurianic Kabbalah. Many of the pioneers of quantum physics from Eastern Europe were very steeped in Kabbalistic and occult mysticism and so, and to make a long story very short, Astrophysics was able to repackage a lot of these ancient hermetic doctrines and views of The Universe into what is known today as Quantum Physics and Cosmological Astrophysics. And gradually, a third option arose for Atheistic Materialism: Pantheistic Monadism.
Pantheistic Monadism, where the universe is an isotropic and homogenous monad which created itself spontaneously when the conditions were just right for the emergent Universe to emerge...from itself. It is an ancient occult view from Hermetic and Kabbalistic texts and though it was not strictly an Atheistic view, it did not involve the transient eternal God of the Christian faith so it was far better than options one and two, where they simply lost the tennis match between Theism and Atheism.
Pantheism was still a, more or less, Materialistic Cosmology and the word “Pantheism” could easily be replaced with the term “Universe”, in that the term, “Pan”, merely indicated Nature, with Pan being the Greek God of Nature.
And so, the Universe, itself, needed to be redefined as Eternal, and then they could have their Materialistic God, based upon a Universe that magically and spontaneously “emerged” from its very own “emergent properties”. Obviously, the attempt at semantic wordplay and Sophistry by moving the Ontological goal posts from an Eternal Divine Creator God to an Emergent Materialistic Creator God is a both trite and transparent. The only thing achieved in this wordplay, based upon abstractly questionable mathematical quantum equations is to strip God of Absolute Moral Properties and substitute a random, chance, spontaneous, emergent, indifferent, Atheistic Materialistic God.
It turns out that this blatant attempt to surgically remove an Absolute Moral Creator Agency from the Ontological equation serves as conspicuously convenient for any Epistemological Autocracy to advance agendas for Technocratic control, divorced of any Christian morality to intervene.
How did they repackage ancient Hermetic doctrine and Kabbalah into modern quantum physics? It starts with constructing a model of the Universe from quantized particles within the quantum vacuum, which is a Hermetic occult principle. According to quantum mechanics, a vacuum isn't empty at all. It's actually filled with quantum energy and particles that blink in and out of existence for a fleeting moment - strange signals that are known as quantum fluctuations... a kind of information field of potentiality.
Similarly, Hermeticism teaches that information is just as part of the physical reality of the universe as matter and energy. Hermeticism considers information as existing in its own right, something that is given to start with, a fundamental emergent property and part of the inherent nature of the universe. In other words, it had already existed inherently, ETERNALLY, before The Universe had appeared. Ancient Hermetic teachings also mention a universal base material. “The base material of the universe and everything found in it may not appear to be born in and of itself, although it does inherently carry the potentiality of all characteristics…” (Hermes, 2001, p. 165). And this base material cannot be anything other than pure information. (Laszlo, E. (1996). The Cosmic Connection.)
Further, in the occult Hermetic view, the quantum vacuum is the primordial phenomenon of the cosmos, and it is Holographic in structure, contains indescribably dense energies, and is part of every process in the universe. This immense sea of vacuum is in fact a gigantic information field—the “Akashic Field”—that binds the particles of matter together into the fabric of the universe. Its effects are presented in the field that spreads under the “quanta,” lending structure to the particles.
In Hermes's words: “For everything that reveals itself was created beforehand, allowing its manifestation to unfold” (Hermes, 2001, p. 163).
Both Hermeticism and Modern Quantum Theory teaches that the universe is made up of vibrations, with everything that is in existence vibrating at a particular frequency. This “wave ripple” is said to allegedly derive its vibration from The Big Bang. They assert that clusters of vibration are the fundamental things that exist. The whole world is composed of different variations of these. Matter itself is none other than a form of observable vibrations. “Matter yet to be created has no form; that comes about once it begins to function,” as Hermes claims (2001, p. 117).
Attempts have been made from this Hermetic occult perspective of quantum fluctuations to extrapolate to Quantum Gravity, especially in Loop Formalism, as well as in Classical General Relativity. The idea of The Emergent Universe is the result of the search for the “singularity-free” inflationary model in classical general relativity. So, an emergent universe model can be defined as a singularity-free universe which is ever existing (Eternal) with an almost static nature in the infinite past (t → −∞) and then evolves into an inflationary stage. In fact, an extension of the original Lemaitre-Eddington model can be termed as the Emergent Universe.
Crucial to note is that the Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (FLRW) metric FLRW metric starts with the assumption of homogeneity and isotropy of space. It cannot be proven. It is merely an ad hoc assumption in order to complete a new and revised Standard Model of the Universe that utilizes the unification of the Quantum Field, Special Relativity, and Gravity without having to sufficiently renormalize the gravitational equations at the singularity flash point.
In other words, Modern Science makes up anything it wants along the way to keep their Pantheistic Monad fantasy plausible. This is Scientism at its very best, which is very different than actual empirical science.
In the end result, it is extremely tempting to make a fetish out of physics and preclude any other epistemological domains of inquiry other than a purist materialistic perspective to Ontological matters. Ontology, being the major branch of philosophy known as metaphysics, studies concepts that directly relate to being, in particular becoming, existence, reality, as well as the basic categories of being and their relations. In their attempt at Ontological explanations, The Atheist had degenerated into a faith based religion, with egg on their faces.
Now, when physics spills over into metaphysics and attempts to answer questions concerning existence and the very nature of reality, itself, by employing a strict Methodological Naturalism bias to all aspects of its inquiry, it severely oversteps its purpose, bounds, and the parameters in which the natural sciences were initially developed for exploring the known material world. Physics is simple an ill-equipped tool to answer Ontological questions of existence and the origins of life and reality, itself. It’s the wrong tool, in fact.
As soon as one restricts one’s inquiry to the narrow range of Methodological Naturalism, which is the exclusion of the supernatural from the natural sciences, one truncates the researcher’s native ability to see with panoramic perspicacity and penetrating discernment into the origins of reality. The material reductionist view is a very Dark Ages approach to Ontological exploration. The best one can ever hope to achieve with a strictly materialistic approach to Ontology is the reduction and isolation of various measurable quantities and a limited extrapolation of those known quantities into assumptions and unsupported hypothesis.
And so it stands, from both the theological view and the purely scientific, quantum theoretical view, an Eternal Creator must exist. Just because science has characterized this Eternal Creator with emergent mathematical properties that spontaneously coalesce under conditions favorable for the creation of the Universe, it does not change the necessity for a Creator. All science has done is state that this Eternal Creator is information based, quantum potential, and emergent in nature. Such a definition is indistinguishable from the Transcendental God of the Christian Faith.
In Atheist Science’s desperate struggle to erase the idea of a Transcendental Causal Antecedent to Space and Time, God outside of humanity's full experience, perception, or grasp, they have successfully proven the existence of this very same Transcendental Eternal Creator.