The Academy Award Winning Film, Oppenheimer, Programs The World For an Upcoming Fake Nuclear Event
Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer: Propaganda Promoting Kabbalistic Atomism and The Fake Nuclear Bomb
Oppenheimer | New Trailer:
Turning Point: The Bomb and the Cold War | Official Trailer March 12 NETFLIX Documentary: (Propaganda Production!!!!!!!)
THE OSCARS 2024 ILLUMINATI EXPOSED!:
Perpetual War in The Background: 1984 is Happening Today:
The current wars in the world are not meant to be won.
They are meant to be forever.
In George Orwell’s’ dystopian masterpiece, 1984, there is a perpetual war between Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia, the superstates that emerged from the global atomic war. Orwell was revealing the strategy of modern country states to maintain perpetual war in order to keep the masses in constant fear and poverty, where the individual would simply attribute their impoverished and abyssal living conditions to the current war instead of their government.
In 1984, Oceania is always at war. The enemy is seen to change across the timeline of the book, but the war never ends. Sometimes the enemy may shift in a moment without any kind of admission that this has occurred. For example, during a "Hate Week" rally, the Oceania’s allies suddenly change, and the person giving the speech switches literally mid-sentence and goes from reviling one enemy nation to reviling another. The place where the battles are occurring is never stated, it’s just somewhere far away.
This is exactly what is happening in the world today with the war between The United States and The European and NATO alliances, Ukraine, and Russia, which represent Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia.
Under the guise of needing to maintain perpetual peace, the war machine of the military industrial complex has maintained perpetual war.
George Orwell’s 1984 describes a dystopian society in which the future of London, a city in the super-state of Oceania, is abysmal and steeped in totalitarianism and perpetual war. As seen through the eyes of Winston, a humble citizen turned impassioned rebel, the control of the totalitarian regime “Ingsoc” is an undeniable part of every citizen’s life in Oceania. This, combined with the regime’s state of perpetual war with either Eastasia or Eurasia over disputed territory, makes these themes in 1984 an interesting case for analysis through the lens of Charles Tilly’s “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime” and Hannah Arendt’s Origins of Totalitarianism. Through this analysis, it is clear Oceania holds a monopoly on violence and is engaged in war making, in fact perpetual war making, through external and internal extractions. Additionally, it is a totalitarian utopia because of its efficient use of the secret police for identification of objective enemies, its monopoly on facts, and its desensitization of generations of citizens.
What are the two central goals of the governing party?
1. Extinguish all free thought
2. Control all people
How is perpetual war no different than perpetual peace?
1. War creates scarcity of goods and food and allows the Party to keep inhabitants under control and dependent on the party.
2. The party is the “savior and protector”
3. The people will never rebel against the party.
Why does the governing party censor all information and erase the past?
Is it important that our present society remember the past? Without a memory of the past, which is what all party owned and operated media outlets are currently erasing, Big Brother governing party) is exalted as infallible. By erasing the past, there is no means to compare with the present, and therefore, we do not know if it is better or worse.
What purposes do advanced science and technology serve in controlling the masses?
1. The advancements limit one’s privacy and control citizens.
2. The aim is opposite of improving one’s life.
What is the greatest threat to the governing party losing its power?
1. Freedom of thought is the governing party’s greatest threat.
Would the governing party authorize the military to bomb its own people and blame it on another country?
Yes. This would create fear of the enemy and a greater dependence and adoration of the party and Big Brother as the protector.
And They Say I am the Crazy One?
So, you mean to tell me that with technology thousands of times more advanced, and a black budget of billions of available dollars, but only being spent on any and everything BUT going to The Moon, we have never returned to The Moon in over 50 years?
And they say I am the crazy one?
So, you mean to tell me that two nuclear bombs were dropped August 6th and 7th, 1945, in Japan, and with nuclear technology that is a fraction as sophisticated as today’s nuclear technology, and with plans for building nuclear bombs freely available on The Internet, as well as nuclear materials being relatively easy to acquire by thousands of underground terrorists and terrorist countries, and yet not one nuclear device has ever been used in any terrorists attack, major battle, or war ever since 1945?
And they say I am the crazy one?
Totalitarianism and Perpetual War: 1984: A Case Study:
(By Prachi Jain)
In this literary case study, Prachi Jain balances a close reading of Orwell’s classic 1984 with a discussion of Hannah Arendt and Charles Tilly’s scholarship on Totalitarian regimes.
George Orwell’s 1984 describes a dystopian society in which the future of London, a city in the super-state of Oceania, is abysmal and steeped in totalitarianism and perpetual war. As seen through the eyes of Winston, a humble citizen turned impassioned rebel, the control of the totalitarian regime “Ingsoc” is an undeniable part of every citizen’s life in Oceania. This, combined with the regime’s state of perpetual war with either Eastasia or Eurasia over disputed territory, makes these themes in 1984 an interesting case for analysis through the lens of Charles Tilly’s “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime” and Hannah Arendt’s Origins of Totalitarianism. Through this analysis, it is clear Oceania holds a monopoly on violence and is engaged in war making, in fact perpetual war making, through external and internal extractions. Additionally, it is a totalitarian utopia because of its efficient use of the secret police for identification of objective enemies, its monopoly on facts, and its desensitization of generations of citizens.
The Lost Meaning of ‘War’:
In order to understand the complicated foreign relations Oceania has with Eastasia and Eurasia, it is first essential to apply Charles Tilly’s theories about war making as organized crime and war leading to creation of states. According to Tilly, states engage in four actions:
1. War Making: Eliminating or neutralizing their own rivals outside the territories in which they have clear and continuous priority as wielders of force
2. State Making: Eliminating or neutralizing their rivals inside those territories
3. Protection: Eliminating or neutralizing the enemies of their clients
4. Extraction: Acquiring the means of carrying out the first three activities—war making, state making, and protection (Tilly, 1985, p.181)
Oceania is already a state, as described by Emmanuel Goldstein, a former Party member and assumed leader of the Brotherhood: “With the absorption of Europe by Russia and the British Empire by the United States, two of the three existing powers, Eurasia and Oceania, were already effectively in being. The third, Eastasia, only emerged as a distinct unit after another decade of confused fighting” (Orwell, 2015, p.185). This is important because it highlights that the territories of the three super states are already decided and that all three are evenly matched in terms of strength in warfare. Surely war played a part in creating the three super states themselves: however, the meaning of war in the novel contrasts with Tilly’s argument about war as international relations. While Tilly (1985) points to war being waged to defend or enhance a position within the system (p.184), in the novel, Goldstein’s book explains that war has lost all meaning, since there is no victory, and war is never ending between the three states. The sole purpose of the war between Oceania, Eurasia, and Eastasia is to keep the wheels of industry churning without increasing the wealth of the world. Thus, by the Party’s standards, war is peace. The Party’s foreign policy concerning war is reflected in the oppression of its citizens because the continuous war destroys any surplus of consumer goods, keeping inhabitants in a vicious circle of poverty.
Even though motivations for war are interpreted differently by Tilly and Goldstein, war making does indeed lead to state making both in 1984 and in regimes observed by Tilly. As Tilly observed, European governments created a monopoly of violence by extending their officialdom to the local community through bureaucracies, similar to institutions such as the Ministries of Truth, Love, Plenty, and Peace in 1984. Each ministry’s purpose is a contradiction to its name. For example, the Ministry of Truth is a propaganda ministry, responsible for the falsification of historical records. The Ministries of Love, Plenty, and Peace are responsible for brainwashing, overseeing the rationing of food, supplies, and goods, and fueling perpetual war, respectively. Tilly describes how European governments also encouraged the creation of police forces that were subordinate to the government, a feature also seen in the novel as the more dangerous Thought Police. The Thought Police is an organization in Oceania that demands officers address Party loyalty by eradicating scores of people who go against Party beliefs.
Tilly (1985) also argues that protection is a double-edged sword because “with one tone, protection calls up images of the shelter against the danger provided by a powerful friend… with the other, it evokes the racket in which a local strong man forces merchants to pay tribute in order to avoid damage” (p.170). When this theory is applied to states, it looks as if states can be organized as racketeers to the extent that false threats are created by the government to continue the cycle of war and maintain the illusion that states protect their citizens whether they demand it or not. This is applicable to Oceania, where it becomes apparent that the Party maintains a perpetual war with either Eastasia or Eurasia in order to manufacture a need for protection and then offer that protection to its citizens. Winston explains how “for several months during his childhood there had been confused street fighting in London itself” (Orwell, 2015, p. 33). He goes on: “Oceania was at war with Eurasia and in alliance with Eastasia… actually, as Winston well knew, it was only four years ago since Oceania had been at war with Eastasia and in an alliance with Eurasia” (Orwell, 2015, p. 35). There is mass confusion as to whether Oceania is at war with Eastasia or Eurasia because of the Party’s control of information and distortion of the past.
Perpetual war is important, Goldstein argues, because war extracts cheap foreign labor, which distracts the masses and ultimately keeps citizens poor to preserve a hierarchical society (Orwell, 2015, p. 189). Extraction, either internal or external, is the means by which the state executes its promise of protection and intention of state building. Internal extraction demands resources from the state’s own citizens, while external extraction exploits the conquered population’s resources—in this case, labor power. Tilly (1985) describes a need for internal extraction, one that states can monetize in forms “ranging from outright plunder to regular tribute to bureaucratized taxation” (p. 181). These forms of extraction are characterized as those that are obtained from within the state. Tilly (1985) also briefly comments on external extraction, writing that the “power holders’ pursuit of war involved them willy-nilly in the extraction of resources for war making from the populations over which they had control…” (p. 172). In Oceania, these extractions are external because perpetual war involves the conquest and exploitation of people in disputed areas.
Even though Tilly argues that internal extraction will lead to better protection, state making, and war making, I argue that Oceania’s external extraction (use of cheap foreign labor) combined with existing internal extraction efforts develop a state maintenance of sorts to preserve the Party’s quest of economic inequality. Oceania is engaged in war with the other two states for labor power, so “whichever power controls equatorial Africa, or the countries of the Middle East, or Southern India, or the Indonesian Archipelago, disposes also of the bodies of scores of hundreds of millions of ill-paid and hard-working coolies” (Orwell, 2015, p.187). Consequently, those hundreds of millions of workers are passed around from conqueror to conqueror as expendable resources that help each state sustain a perpetual war. Even without this external extraction, wars are financed by internal extraction (taxes, etc.). However, the non-domestic and low-cost labor keeps the war perpetual and expedites the war effort. External extraction also brings perpetual poverty for Oceania’s citizens by concentrating on the production of war materials, which are eventually destroyed.
Tilly describes what states do: war making, state making, protection, and extraction. In my analysis, Oceania is a state that engages in perpetual war making between Eastasia or Eurasia, not to defend its borders, but to incite fear in its citizens. War keeps power within the elite Inner Party members, thrusting everyone else into unceasing poverty. Tilly’s theory that war making leads to state making shows that power holders want to maintain their monopoly on violence. To do that, they create bureaucracies and strong police forces—elements emphasized through the Ministries of Peace, Plenty, Love, Truth, and the Thought Police in 1984. Furthermore, protection is a legitimized business in Oceania because the Party preserves the citizens in a state of never-ending fear by spreading propaganda about its current enemy. Finally, in addition to internal extraction (collection of taxes or tributes within Oceania) as a means for state making, war making, and protection, Oceania’s ruling party emphasizes external extraction of cheap foreign labor to fund and maintain protection policies and perpetual war. Ultimately, indefinite war making and state making as organized crime are so efficient that Oceania is classifiable as a totalitarian state.
London in a Dystopian Fog: A Totalitarian’s Dream:
From page one Oceania is depicted as a totalitarian state, one that has remarkable parallels to The Origins of Totalitarianism by Hannah Arendt. Arendt explains how totalitarian regimes exchange the use of veiled threats and scientific proofs (a means of validating propaganda) in their efforts to direct commands once they are in power, to distinguish between suspect and objective enemies through their use of a secret police, and to spread their ideology so that neighbors appear more threatening. She distinguishes between all three aforementioned actions of totalitarian regimes both during their movement to gain power and after the regime has gained power (Arendt, 1958, p.345). The difference between these regimes is that once they are in power, justification of government actions is irrelevant. The Party of Oceania is examined through the totalitarian regime in power because the novel is set in a period in which the Party already successfully completed the totalitarian movement to power.
Arendt (1958) contends that “science in the instances of both business publicity and totalitarian propaganda is obviously only a surrogate for power. The obsession of totalitarian movements with ‘scientific’ proofs ceases once they are in power” (p. 345). In Oceania, the Party replaced scientific propaganda with direct commands, a characteristic of totalitarian regimes. The Party literally alters history (without justification) to reflect how well their regime is functioning at the present moment. For example, Winston works in the ironically named Ministry of Truth where he updates old newspapers with statements from the Party. One message read “times 19.12.83 forecasts 3 yp 4th quarter 83 misprints verify current issue” (Orwell, 2015, p. 38), which meant that the forecasts for various classes of consumption goods were incorrect, and Winston had to rewrite the old forecasts to reflect the actual numbers. The control of information without justification is a classic characteristic of totalitarianism in power.
Another distinction for Arendt is the use of secret police or spy services to eliminate enemies, both objective and suspect. Suspect enemies are those who threaten the regime’s movement to power, or political opponents (Arendt, 1958, p.421). Objective enemies are enemies that threaten the existence of the regime in power; Arendt (1958) describes objective enemies as those “…defined by the policy of the government and not by his own desire to overthrow it” (p. 423). Suspect enemies are eliminated through the use of provocation in the totalitarian movement; objective enemies, on the other hand, are hunted once the regime is in power (Arendt, 1958, p.422). In the process of hunting down suspected enemies in the movement, the re-education of old party members is common amongst totalitarian regimes, and eventually “it is during this stage that a neighbor gradually becomes a more dangerous enemy to one who happens to harbor ‘dangerous thoughts’ than are the officially appointed police agents” (Arendt, 1958, p.422).
In 1984, Winston describes his neighbor’s children: “Both of them dressed in the blue shorts, gray shirts, and red neckerchiefs which were the uniform of the Spies” (Orwell, 2015, p.23). In Oceania, children are encouraged to join organizations such as the Spies and the Youth League so they can be brainwashed into thinking the Party’s word is the only truth. Eventually, generations of citizens are made paranoid if they oppose Party ideology—war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength. Although this process happens during the movement phase of totalitarianism, I argue that in 1984 ideology conditioning and paranoia are formally reinforced to younger generations after the regime is in power to ensure the survival of the regime. Winston describes his neighbor and co-worker, Parsons, as “one of those completely unquestioning, devoted drudges on whom, more even than on the Thought Police, the stability of the Party depended” (Orwell, 2015, p.22). He goes on to describe how Parsons’ kids are becoming indoctrinated with the same loyalty to the Party when one of the kids calls Winston a traitor and accuses him of thought crime (Orwell, 2015, p.22). Undoubtedly, the Party rigorously trains younger generations to report thought crimes even after the regime is in power.
In the case of 1984, it seems an objective enemy is anyone who commits thought crime or goes against Party ideology, which is adjustable according to the changing will of the leader. The members of the Outer Party in Oceania are labeled objective enemies since the “Proles” are left alone and treated like animals. According to Arendt (1958), objective enemies are hunted, not targeted for a reason, so “the task of the totalitarian police is not to discover crimes, but to be on hand when the government decides to arrest a certain category of the population” (p. 426). In 1984, the telescreens are mandatory 24/7 monitoring devices that cannot be turned off and are the equivalent of Arendt’s secret police, while the Thought Police officers are just a vehicle for carrying out exterminations or making a person an “unperson” (one who is caught by the Thought Police and eliminated from history itself). An example of an objective enemy is Syme, Winston’s friend in the research department. While conversing with Winston about Newspeak, Syme asserts “…the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought” (Orwell, 2015, p.52) and several chapters later, he is found to never have existed. Therefore, it seems Syme was eliminated just because he was able to understand the true nature of Newspeak (thought conformity), qualifying him as an objective enemy who could spread ideas about the Party’s true intentions.
Oceania embodies the utopian goal of the totalitarian leader because Oceania has all the attributes Arendt defined as totalitarian, only more efficient. The Party in Oceania is totalitarian because the party is already in power and can justify the absence of “scientific” facts, the separation of suspect and objective enemy through the use of a secret police, and the education of younger generations toward Party loyalty.
Conclusion:
Analyzing Charles Tilly’s idea of war making, and Hannah Arendt’s concept of totalitarianism reveals important similarities to Oceania. Similar to Tilly’s idea of state expansion and war making as organized crime, Oceania engages in state making through its institutions and is in a perpetual war with international states for the illusion of protecting its citizens. Oceania’s external extraction policy further supports the eternal war through its exploitation of cheap foreign labor. Analogous to Arendt’s description of totalitarian regimes, the Party is also totalitarian because of its desire to eliminate objective enemies, be the sole expert on factual information, and desensitize the younger generations of citizens to the ways of the Party.
References
Arendt, H. (1958). Origins of Totalitarianism (2nd Ed.). Cleveland, OH: The World Publishing Company.
Orwell, G., & Fromm, E. (2015). 1984: a novel. New York, NY: Signet Classics.
Tilly, C. (1985). War Making and State Making as Organized Crime. In P. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, & T. Skocpol. Bringing the State Back In (pp. 169-186). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Published February 5, 2018, https://blogs.baruch.cuny.edu/lexingtonreview/journal/totalitarianism-and-perpetual-war-1984-a-case-study/
I’m Sure the New Christopher Nolan Film, Oppenheimer, Will Be Dazzling, But Just Remember That It’s a Science Fiction Film Based Upon Pseudoscience
Oppenheimer is a biographical thriller film, written and directed by Christopher Nolan. It stars Cillian Murphy as J. Robert Oppenheimer, the American theoretical physicist credited with being The Father of The Atomic Bomb” for his role in the Manhattan Project—the World War II undertaking that allegedly developed the first nuclear weapons. Based on the 2005 biography American Prometheus by Kai Bird and Martin J. Sherwin, the film chronicles the career of Oppenheimer, with the story predominantly focusing on his studies, his direction of the Manhattan Project during World War II, and his eventual fall from grace due to his 1954 security hearing. The film also stars Emily Blunt as Oppenheimer's wife "Kitty", Matt Damon as head of the Manhattan Project Leslie Groves, Robert Downey Jr. as U.S. Atomic Energy Commission member Lewis Strauss, and Florence Pugh as Oppenheimer's communist lover Jean Tatlock. The ensemble supporting cast includes Josh Hartnett, Casey Affleck, Rami Malek, and Kenneth Branagh.
Nuclear Bombs are not real, and now they are re-insinuating The Nuclear Hoax, using Trump, Putin, China, Oppenheimer, etc…to make the world fear of a nuclear war, again. They are fomenting WW III by beating the drums of war in 2023. And multiple Hollywood movies have perpetuated this radioactive fallout myth to terrorize people and keep them from going to places that they are not supposed to go, in addition to having a way for explaining away all the millions of new vaccine deaths as radioactive fallout casualties.
“Putinheimer” and the Spectre of Nuclear War
By Paul Meyer, a fellow in international security and adjunct professor of international studies at Simon Fraser University, and a director of the Canadian Pugwash Group:
One can credit the strange pairing of Vladimir Putin and Christopher Nolan for reviving our attention to nuclear weapons – the former through his blatant nuclear “saber-rattling,” and the latter by his directorial depiction of J. Robert Oppenheimer, the chief scientist behind the creation of the atomic bomb, with all his attendant doubts and guilt. Their combined actions in the real world and the cinema have had the effect of waking up global society to the risks inherent in nuclear weaponry – the weapon of mass destruction par excellence.
There are allegedly approximately 12,500 nuclear weapons held today in the arsenals of the nine nuclear-armed states, many with a devastating power far beyond the bombs used against Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan in August 1945, which killed upwards of 100,000 people. The continued existence of these weapons is out of mind for most, some even thinking these nasty arms had disappeared with the end of the Cold War.
The reality, however, is that states still cling to these weapons and threaten each other with mass destruction under contingencies described as “remote” but unspecified. This policy of “nuclear deterrence” is claimed by its adherents as being effective in preventing war. Others note the number of wars initiated between non-nuclear weapon states and nuclear weapon states despite the fact that only the latter possessed these deadly arms. And what about the risks attendant upon maintaining nuclear deterrent forces in light of the probabilities of human and/or technical errors that would bring us close to the abyss?
A couple of these nuclear weapon-possessing states, namely China and India, have adopted “no first use” doctrines, which preclude the use of their nuclear weapons unless they are first attacked with weapons of mass destruction. The others have, to date, refused to embrace such policies, and retain the option to employ these weapons first in a conflict. Given that thousands of these nuclear weapons are kept at a high-alert status and states retain “launch on warning” postures, it is no wonder that Gareth Evans, Australia’s former foreign minister, has said that it is by “sheer, dumb luck” that the world has not witnessed a nuclear weapon detonation since 1945.
As nuclear-weapon complexes are shrouded in secrecy, it is not surprising that little information is ever released concerning the close calls and actual accidents that have occurred over the decades. The introduction of potent new technologies, such as cyber operations, anti-satellite weapons and AI, all can contribute to targeting nuclear weapon facilities and their early warning systems in a manner that could be horrendously destabilizing. One might wish that states would seize opportunities to apply restraints to these emerging technologies in a way that would dampen rather than fuel nuclear escalation. Regrettably, this is not the case, and we are witnessing a new upward spiral in the arms race between major nuclear powers.
The arms-control frameworks that were carefully constructed during the Cold War are being systematically dismantled as hostile rhetoric, rather than constructive dialogue, is increasingly characterizing relations between major powers. Russia and the United States, which account for 90 per cent of the world’s nuclear arsenal, bear a special responsibility for maintaining international security in the nuclear domain. Yet both sides have allowed their strategic dialogue to terminate and have engaged in a “tit for tat” suspension of the commitments they agreed to in 2010 when jointly signing on to the New START arms reduction treaty.
Despite their declared wishes to see a follow-up treaty to New START when it expires in February 2026, there has been no actual interaction on this goal. Instead of engaging on this core issue, both parties are acting like petulant schoolboys refusing to talk to one another after a squabble
If the effects of nuclear weapons use were only confined to the territory of the states employing them, the rest of the world might ignore these risks with a “plague on both your houses” attitude. Alas, this is not the case, as all of the world would suffer from nuclear war.
The danger of such a war erupting has prompted the editors of 100 leading medical and health journals to publish an editorial seeking urgent action to reduce this risk. The editorial calls on health professionals “to alert the public and their leaders to this major danger to public-health and essential life support systems of the planet – and urge action to prevent it.” Maybe it’s time for the world to follow this sobering medical advice.
Resurrecting The Nuclear Bomb Hoax in 2022: The Big Stick Myth of Nuclear Bombs
Making up the H-Bomb: What the Myth Was, and Why They Made It:
Freemason Insider, Stanley Kubrick’s, Dr. Strangelove, shows crazed U.S. military officer, General Ripper, riding The A-Bomb:
Nuclear Bombs are not real, and now they are re-insinuating The Nuclear Hoax, using Trump, Putin, China, etc… to make the world fear of a nuclear war. again. They are fomenting WW III by beating the drums of war in 2022.
And multiple Hollywood movies have perpetuated this radiative fallout myth to terrorize people and keep them from going to places that they are not supposed to go, in addition to having a way for explaining away all the millions of new vaccine deaths as radioactive fallout casualties.
Hiroshima and ground zero epicenter. Everything should have been vaporized, and yet no concrete buildings fell because there was no nuclear bomb blast. It was a Carpet Fire Bombing, and concrete does not burn. Plants were growing a week later. All a hoax...
But they hide the truth in plain sight:
Oblivion
For instance, in the movie, Oblivion, the heroes discover the truth in a vast desert that the radiation zone is a hoax to keep them quarantined in an area.
The Island
In the movie, The Island, by Michael Bay, we see a similar quarantine theme but it has to do with an imaginary virus, which was simply a ruse to keep people from venturing beyond their quarantined area. It is interesting how radioactive quarantine is similar to viral quarantine in cinema.
The Island is a 2005 American dystopian science fiction action thriller film directed and co-produced by Michael Bay from a story by Caspian Tredwell-Owen. It stars Ewan McGregor, Scarlett Johansson, Djimon Hounsou, Sean Bean, Michael Clarke Duncan, and Steve Buscemi. The film is about Lincoln Six Echo (McGregor), who struggles to fit into the highly structured world in which he lives, isolated in a compound, and the series of events that unfold when he questions how truthful that world is. After Lincoln learns the compound inhabitants are clones used for organ harvesting as well as surrogates for wealthy people in the outside world, he attempts to escape with Jordan Two Delta (Johansson) and expose the illegal cloning.
Plot
In 2019, Lincoln Six Echo and Jordan Two Delta live with others in an isolated compound. This dystopian community is governed by a strict set of rules. The residents are told that the outside world has become too contaminated to support life with the exception of a pathogen-free island. Each week, one resident gets to leave the compound and live on the island by way of a lottery.
Lincoln begins having dreams that he knows are not from his own experiences. Dr. Merrick, a scientist who runs the compound, is concerned and places probes in Lincoln's body to monitor his cerebral activity. While secretly visiting an off-limits power facility in the basement where technician James McCord works, Lincoln discovers a live moth in a ventilation shaft, leading him to deduce the outside world is not really contaminated.
Oppenheimer | New Trailer:
News Stories from 2022:
Trump:
“The Washington Post reported Thursday that “classified documents relating to nuclear weapons” were among the things FBI agents were looking for when they searched Mar-a-Lago this week. And there were numerous examples of “secret,” “confidential,” and “top secret” documents listed on the official property receipt from the seizure that was released Friday.”
Putin:
“The 12th main directorate of the Russian Ministry of Defense operates a dozen central storage facilities for nuclear weapons. Known as “Object S” sites and scattered across the Russian Federation, they contain thousands of nuclear warheads and hydrogen bombs with a wide variety of explosive yields. For the past three months, President Vladimir Putin and other Russian officials have been ominously threatening to use nuclear weapons in the war against Ukraine.”
China:
“The west risks the initiation of nuclear conflict with China or Russia because of a “breakdown of communication” with the two countries, the UK’s national security adviser has warned.”
You see, they want to unleash hell on Earth, using conventional weapons, in order to have another plausible reason to and blame the vaccine deaths on fake radioactive fallout.
Let’s backtrack a little here…
If we assume A-bombs never worked, why go on to invent H-Bombs too?
Well....
It had occurred to me that perhaps Groves and the others realized that they had gone too far in promoting their imaginary atomic bomb as a wonderful weapon. The general public began thinking up a lot of good uses for it.
During Vietnam, people said, "Why don't they just drop the bomb on them?" And even during the Iraq invasion, people said, “Why don't they just nuke them?" It may have surprised the Manhattan group that White Christians didn't have any reservations about obliterating non-white, non-Christians. And why be afraid of a weapon that only you possessed?
Realizing that the public might start demanding the use of the atomic bomb, which of course couldn't be realized because it didn't exist, they had to think up reasons not to use the bomb.
So I can imagine a four prong method:
1) Promote this radiation stuff, that drifted with the wind, so that an atomic war could never be localized, but affected everyone around earth.
2) Promote the 'brotherhood of man' in all the Christian churches, so that white Christians would have some reservations about bombing someone halfway around the world. (I don't think this has worked so well, really.)
3) 'Leak' the plans for the imaginary weapon to the USSR and other places. Develop Mutually Assured Destruction. So, the weapon isn't yours alone anymore.
4) Juice the weapons up to such a size, and say there are so many of them, and talk about how many times over the earth could be destroyed.
Thus, making nuclear war 'unthinkable'.
Very ingenious point, worth repeating. At the time, late 50s/ early 60s, Bertrand Russell was saying something like '... modern science has made it inevitable that all must live or all must die.' This seems an odd claim, since hardly any countries were supposed to have the things. But if there's huge destruction and radiation, and moreover if shelters are stated to be more or less impractical, then neighbors and other countries get harmed, too. Also it made it necessary to have leaks to the 'Russians', i.e. Jews controlling the Soviet Union, which of course is the sort of thing Jews do habitually on auto-pilot. It also made it necessary to oppose Senator Joseph McCarthy and generally agitate in favor of supposed spies - if the issue really had been that serious, it's hard to imagine anyone being lax about it. (Similar thing with AIDS of course).
Russell is now known to have been fed information from British official sources, and it's hard to know how much of it was Russell giving his own views, and Russell trimming to e.g. suit his view of world government. The info to him must have been rather secret - Denis Healey says in his autobiography that he visited Russell to quiz him on nuclear issues, but wasn't impressed, suggesting various branches were doing their own things.
Just like many childhood fantasies promoted by the state, I used to believe in the atomic bomb. Then I grew up. I realized that every official pronouncement of the state must be held as being highly suspicious. Here are some reasons why I question the very existence of nuclear bombs. Supporting evidence for points below will be covered later.
Trinity film documentation shows the building of a tower like the supposed nuclear bomb tower but with TNT. Building of the TNT tower was purportedly for comparing a nuclear blast to a conventional explosion. This is claimed to be the largest ever conventional blast. Considering that many of the Manhattan project scientists doubted that nuclear bomb technology could work at all, the rush to produce a highly theoretical technology could have easily been faked, with the army passing off the TNT detonation as the nuclear one. If the nuclear bomb technology were impossible, it is entirely plausible for such a B scenario to exist. At least one of the highest scientists was excluded from examining the Trinity blast--a blast which was conducted at night, with observers not needing to know the actual distance, and which had characteristics they could not verify as being different from a huge conventional blast.
This is a TNT Explosion…Notice The Mushroom Cloud?
The Geopolitical Claims and Implications of Nuclear Weapons are Myths
Critical examinations of the technical specifications and technical hurdles makes the production of nuclear bombs unlikely. The technical hurdles are made exponentially more difficult as a result of proposed miniaturization of nukes even to the size of grapefruit.
The over-the-top claims of an artificial element that can have all the amazing and improbable properties of plutonium making it excellent for producing complicated bombs is consistent of the creation of an elaborate fiction.
The apocalyptic nature of the exaggerated claims of nuclear weapons and the threat of creating a nuclear winter calls into serious question the very existence of nuclear weapons. This is evidence that the nuclear narratives are more characteristic of Psyops rather than of reality.
The improbable properties of plutonium for the production of nuclear bombs also calls into question its purported use in nuclear powered space probes. Where is all the lead shielding that would be required to protect workers and components of these space probes, which incidentally would also make it too heavy to launch?
The Claim that The Soviet Union and The United States Were Avowed Enemies During the Cold War is a Myth
No credible evidence exists that there has ever been such a device as an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile of Soviet origin. No credible evidence exists that the Soviets had any quantity of nuclear weapons as claimed by the US government.
No unedited film footage exists of an American ICBM being launched on one continent and arriving on another continent.
The Intense Race for the Bomb Has Intense Political Motives for Forgery
The dimensions and weights of the bombs are not consistent with photos showing bombs being suspended or transported without expected heavy duty hardware.
Film footage of the supposed nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are edited and cannot be verified by chain of custody or chain of events.
The many of the proposed human effects of these nuclear bombings have not been independently verified but have been under strict military control.
The purported nuclear bomb areas were under very strict control by US military so that independent scientific verification of nuclear phenomena have not been made.
Museum artifacts at the Hiroshima museum contain features easily forged with claims not independently verified.
Photographs of Hiroshima match the characteristics of conventional firebombing when compared to cities like Tokyo. Hiroshima lacks any characteristics that would be unique to a claimed nuclear bombing.
Movie footage of purported nuclear bomb detonations commonly show visual affects consistent with special effects and overlay of different exposures. Movies are often Hollywood-style with frequent splicing of unrelated footage put together as one event. A: for instance, ubiquitous cuts between explosions, audience reactions, and instrumentation. This with the raw archival footage???
The extreme fear-mongering during the Cold War is itself suspect. It took a sharp turn from the constant paranoia of mutually assured destruction, to paranoia after the Cold War that Soviet scientists were selling nuclear bomb components to terrorists, yet this never led to any of these feared nuclear attacks. The lack of any nuclear detonations at the hands of enemy nations or terrorists (even accidentally) supports the notion that nukes do not exist.
Claims of extreme danger of the materials associated with making nuclear weapons and the maintenance of nuclear power plants has been brought into question by a nuclear expert who would swim in pools of water used in nuclear power plants without any ill effect.
Color footage of supposed nuclear test detonations are also inconsistent with the temperatures purported to be involved. With temperatures identical to that of the sun, we shouldn't be seeing dirty orange fire and black smoke, which is more characteristic of things like TNT or napalm. The idea that mushroom clouds are unique to nuclear blasts is also a complete myth. In fact, you can create a mushroom cloud explosion in your backyard with common materials.
Psyops are just an extension of propaganda so it's important to question everything, however uncomfortable it may be.
I would like everyone to consider what the nuclear hoax implies. Really, this would be the mother of all state hoaxes of the twentieth century. Consider that the nuclear bomb was impossible to make. The science was not there. The theories were incorrect. The genius of geniuses were fabrications. Not even a thousand million dollars could produce the impossible--a weapon of apocalyptic proportions that produces the heat of 10,000 suns! Give me a break! The bomb never made anyone surrender. It never won a war. It did not deter wars. It did not stop Communism.
The Communist never has a nuclear threat. The cold war was a fantasy. The military industrial complex which was sustained to counter the Soviet nuclear threat was a big lie. The massive secret infrastructure to counter the Soviet nuclear threat was a big lie. The space race based on superior technology is in question as well. Excuse me, but the whole rationale for building the massive state super complex after WWII is a complete fraud. And all the nuclear paranoia promoted by the state is downright evil. Even now the rhetoric that states blurt out on mass media about this or that power trying to obtain nuclear weapons is a complete charade. I sleep better. I feel relieved. There is no doomsday weapon. There never has been. We've been had. Now we can really start to live and be free.
Hiroshima was fire bombed, There NEVER was an Atomic Bomb. It's all a hoax, that cost US taxpayers $ 20-40 billion annual for the charade: upgrading the fake Nukes, silos, storage, manufacturing, distribution, all FAKE NUKES.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombings Were Fire Bombings: Notice That Buildings at Ground Zero Epicenter Were Unaffected Because Stone Does Not Burn
Why do governments surround us with lies? - to retain their power.
Truth disposes dictators!
Bank of Japan building at Rijo Dori street, Kamiya-cho, Naka ku, Hiroshima, 2013, was built 1936 and located almost below the alleged atomic bomb explosion 1945. It survived the bombing without serious damages, a clear evidence that no atomic bomb was used - only napalm carpet bombing.
Our world view effects what we can see & consider.
You can review and confirm this. WE have to know and act in truth.
If we avoid establishing truth, then the world's rich bankers / media / government will continue to destroy our world, our freedom, our reality.
On the "A-bomb" on Hiroshima, the evidence, is that it was just firebombed like Tokyo.
Was there any radiation after the bombing? The Street Cars of Hiroshima were up and running 3 days after the bombing.
The area was photographed by people walking around on foot (no radiation?).
Wood buildings were destroyed, but the masonry buildings remained.
Jakob Thorin (his last name is not pronounced like you might think) comes on to talk about an odd duck who raged all over the JREF board about the impossibility of building a nuclear (fission and fusion) bomb. Just can't happen. Didn't work in 1945. Won't work today. It's just a money grab, folks. Atomic bombs do not work! Nuclear bomb won’t work folks!
Summary:
Atomic bombs do not work.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not destroyed by atomic bombs in 1945.
The Japanese towns with their simple wood/paper houses were destroyed by napalm carpet bombings.
The atomic bombs were just US propaganda of false information to impress the Soviet Union. But Stalin wasn't fooled. He invented/ faked his own atomic bomb 1949. The 69 years old hoax from 6 August 1945 is still working kept going strong by physicists that cannot get any better jobs than lying for their governments - the only real job many physicists can get (apart from being a school teacher). Iran is trying for 30 years to fake their Islamic atomic bomb that Stalin did in four years. The International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA, and its boss Yukiya Amano are part of the hoax. Just ask them about it.
Multiple documentaries explore the truth about nuclear energy and the surprisingly abundant evidence that nuclear weapons are a hoax. Many of the nuclear explosion videos we have all seen and presumed real are shown to be complete fakes using model trees, houses and cars exploding on a set.
The destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not the result of one large explosion as advertised, but rather the result of a fire-bombing campaign comparable to Tokyo's fire-bombed remains. Hiroshima and Nagasaki also never experienced anything like the hundreds or thousands of years of radiation predicted by nuclear scientists, in fact, vegetation began growing within a month after the bombing, and the Japanese people began rebuilding almost immediately! Some nuclear physicists even claim nuclear weaponry fraudulent based solely on the technical impossibilities of fission material not to be incinerated before triggering the necessary chain reaction. Top nuclear physicist Galen Winsor explains how nuclear power plants are essentially just steam plants and nothing but the most expensive and effective way to boil water. He completely blows the lid off the idea of "nuclear meltdown" or "nuclear waste," and even eats a good portion of live radioactive waste on camera which he claims to have been doing for years! His professional opinion is that fear of nuclear radiation has been greatly exaggerated to scare people and so a few powerful organizations can maintain total control of the world's most valuable energy resource.
All They Did is Superimpose Various Images to Create The Nucler Bomb Images
The A-bomb hoax was created by two sick and powerful men in the 1940's - US president F.D. Roosevelt and USSR dictator J. Stalin. Media assisted to back up the lies! The simple people were made to believe that compressing two pieces of metal together allowed one single neutron to fission one metal atom to start...an A-bomb explosion that happened at Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan August 1945 killing children and women. Compressed metal pieces and neutrons cannot explode but it is against the law to say so and media and universities support this law…so you have to learn about it here.
Nuclear arms are very safe and secure! They cannot harm anything. But it is illegal to say so!
Have you heard about Trofim Lyssenko? He was the inventor of pseudoscience around 1930. Stalin loved him. Ever heard about Stalin? A mass murderer that together with Hitler started WW2 by attacking east Poland and Finland 1939 and the Baltic states 1940 and who US president Roosevelt liked a lot. Stalin could keep east Poland and the Baltic states after WW2. Ever heard about Roosevelt? He created the A-bomb! With a little help from his friends.
Atomic bombs were and are just propaganda. There is no evidence that they worked 1945 or later. The atomic bomb was invented pseudoscientific style by an American - Robert O Lyssenko - a cousin of Trofim - but assisted by A. Einstein and encouraged by Roosevelt!
The "atomic bombs" were actually invented by science fiction writer H.G Wells already 1913 nearly 30 years before US president Roosevelt started the Manhattan Project. Wells' The World Set Free describes cities around the world being devastated by what he called "atomic bombs". Wells predicted not only the mushroom cloud we associate with atomic bombs, but their lasting radiation as well.
(a) "Few who adventured into these areas of destruction and survived attempted any repetition of their experiences. There are stories of puffs of luminous, radio-active vapor drifting sometimes scores of miles from the bomb center and killing and scorching all they overtook."
(b) Hiroshima & Nagasaki were typical chemical firestorm sites like Tokyo, Dresden, Hamburg; 'ground zero' brick concrete steel stayed up, even their flagpoles etc.; radioactive junk could have been dropped with chemicals
(c) most Japan houses were wood so burned
(d) Media hides witnesses who saw multiple bombers, etc.
Nuke bomb terror has earned trillions for the cabal since 1945, and since 1960s has been major tool of Israeli terror against Arabs and the world. USA chemically bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki (like Tokyo, Dresden, Hamburg...).
1945 - USA chemically bombs Hiroshima & Nagasaki (like Tokyo, Dresden, Hamburg...), also dumping illness-inducing radioactive items. Media, & Japanese witnesses who saw plane fleets, told to shut up. Nuke story sold by adding chemical-blast 'mushroom clouds' in film & photos - “USA HAS NUCLEAR BOMBS!”.
1949 - Soviet Union accepts deal for Russian elites to get wealthy by playing along with Cold War & global nuclear terror - “COMMIE RUSSIA HAS THE BOMB!”.
1952 - UK Brits & London financial center doesn’t want to feel 2nd class as Anglo empire dominates world - “UK HAS THE BOMB!”.
1960 - France chafes not to be 2nd class to roast-beef-eating Brits, accepts deal to become nuclear if they pretend to be the ones giving Israel nuclear technology - “FRANCE and DE GAULLE HAVE THE BOMB!”.
1964 - China gets upgraded to major league to help justify escalating military spending - “COMMIE CHINA HAS THE BOMB NOW TOO!”.
1966 - Israel gets to join the club as per earlier deal with France, in time to terrorize & intimidate Arabs in 1967 & 1973 wars - “JEWS HAVE THE BOMB and JEWS ARE READY TO SAMSON OPTION EVERYBODY!”, later confirmed by 'brave whistleblower' Vanunu to MI6 London Times.
1974 - India takes deal to stop being so non-aligned & side more with big powers, insulting India's own heritage by calling their bomb program, 'Smiling Buddha' “INDIA NOW HAS THE BOMB!”.
1979 - South Africa's white apartheid government gets to play act in compensation for all their abuse in Western media, but agrees in advance to 'dismantle' any bombs before Mandela or any black government can find out the scam...joins with Israel & Taiwan in bomb test WHITE RACIST SOUTH AFRICA HAS THE BOMB READY TO KILL BLACK PEOPLE showing “ANYONE CAN GET A BOMB!”., but 'bombs' all taken apart and shipped away before Mandela takes over
1998 - Pakistan is central player in new Western anti-Muslim theme & revving up 'war on terror', and Pakistan finally gets to upgrade to par with old rival India PAKISTANI “MUSLIMS HAVE THE BOMB & OSAMA OR TERRORISTS MIGHT GET AHOLD OF IT!”, plus Pakistan 'sells' bombs to Saudi Arabia for extra bonus
2006 - North Korea, always making deals for latest consumer products for ruling family & elite, gets to upgrade to nuclear club - “CRAZY NORTH KOREA HAS THE BOMB!”.
The "treason" of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg was probably part of the US show and they were not executed but given new identities.
The Cuban missile crisis of 1962 was also a total fake with both Khrushchev and Kennedy cynically aware that they were engaged in a bogus argument about non-existent a-bombs. They had however just a little earlier decided to start the fake space race with cosmos clown Gagarin 1961 flying around the Earth in less than 120 minutes!
In the USA it is against the law to tell the Truth about the A-bomb!
The significance of the atomic bomb for military purposes is clear according the US Atomic Energy Act of 1946 (Public Law 585, 79th Congress).
That really foolish piece of shit, i.e. the US Atomic Energy Act of 1946 (and its revisions) charges the US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), and later the US Department of Energy (DoE), with regulating restricted data wherever it appears and wherever it comes from, i.e. control of information.
In plain language - censorship! The restricted data clause of the US Atomic Energy Act specifies that all nuclear weapons-related information is to be considered classified unless explicitly declassified and makes no distinction about whether said information was created in a laboratory by a government scientist or anywhere else in the world by private citizens.
Major Alexander P. de Seversky, who 1945 inspected the bombed towns of Japan, testified:
“In Hiroshima, I was prepared for radically different sights. But, to my surprise, Hiroshima looked exactly like all the other burned-out cities in Japan. There was a familiar pink blot, about two miles in diameter. It was dotted with charred trees and telephone poles. Only one of the cities twenty bridges was down. Hiroshima's clusters of modern buildings in the downtown section stood upright. It was obvious that the blast could NOT have been so powerful as we had been led to believe. It was extensive blast rather than intensive. I had heard of buildings instantly consumed by unprecedented heat. Yet here I saw the buildings structurally intact, and what is more, topped by undamaged flag poles, lightning rods, painted railings, air raid precaution signs and other comparatively fragile objects. At the T-bridge, the aiming point for the atomic bomb, I looked for the "bald spot" where everything presumably had been vaporized in the twinkling of an eye. It wasn't there or anywhere else. I could find no traces of unusual phenomena.”
Ms. Madelyn R. Creedon, the US assistant secretary of atomic war for global strategic affairs (whatever that can be? - propaganda?) suggested October 30, 2013, that:
“A key component of the life extension program is the replacement of an expensive parachute system with a newly designed tail assembly.”
Madelyn R. Creedon ask Congress for $10 billion to upgrade non-working scrap and plenty 1960's electronics.
She wanted $ 10 billion to upgrade a program that never worked…propaganda!
The A-Bomb weighed about 2 tons? 4,400 kg, but only had 61 kg or 100 lbs. of explosive Uranium?
International Bankers, via Federal Reserve, got control of money (worldwide), They can pay anyone to lie, do evil), for diverse purposes without worrying about the cost effectiveness.
Free money from bankers generates huge problems:
Immorality
Evil
Greed
What bankers want is MORE money and MORE power centralized in their hands.
So how do these ruling powers get people, you and me, to submit to their will?
They threaten people with injury, loss of property, money, or jail.
The elites control the laws, courts, attorney, judges, and legislators with their unlimited "money."
In a poker game, you can bluff. If you do it well, you can win money.
So, from NASA, we see, if you can't do something, then just fake it. (Fake Moon Landings).
It is always easier to fake it than to do.
From Germany WW II, we see the bigger the lie, the more believable it is. People think, surely something so big, so widely known, it must be true. So, in the 1940s, it seemed that Nuclear or Atomic reactions were possible to release HUGE energy.
So, they spent incredible money. You could have just gone to German and Japan and bought all their homes, car, and factories, for less than the cost to bomb them. The government wanted to have the ultimate weapon to threaten other counties and people to submit to us.
So, the US government poured money into The Manhattan Project (How to make a bomb), Oak Ridge Tennessee (Uranium 235), and Hanford Washington (Plutonium) ….how to make or concentrate the VOLATILE nuclear materials.
The ILLUSION was Germany might build the bomb first, so U.S. government spent wasted incredible sums of money to pursue and develop “The Bomb”. They employed 1/2 million people (who did not understand what they were doing). US government. was desperate to build the bomb.
They built huge factories at Oak Ridge, 1/2-mile-long and 1,000 feet wide, 2 million sq. ft., and yet they did not yet even know how the factory would work. (Lots of emergency money spent without much control - working on the fear and urgency tactic).
War, loans, expenditures (in emergencies) are great for banker's profits.
As scientists realized they could not make a workable bomb, they involved 1,000s of soldiers to witness test etc, so that they'd pass the story on by word of mouth, to their nieces, friends, associates, etc…. They saw the (fake) test explosions. Fakes were huge piles of TNT exploded and viewed from 20 miles away. Who would know it was not nuclear?
Then, because this was NATIONAL SECURITY, they label everything as SECRET or even RADIOACTIVE, to keep away prying eyes.
Government forbid people from talking to each other.
Isolate all knowledge, progress, developments. National Security!!! secret, secret, secret!!!
Nuclear Bombs are a Hoax, they never did not will work. They are huge budget expenditure to promote the illusion that they are possible, prepared and abundant.
They induce fear to you and me, to our own countrymen as well as to our supposed enemies.
Military is a self-fulfilling fantasy. Where we once spent on real hardware; planes, tanks, guns, ammunitions, now we spend extreme amounts to just keep the illusion up that we are mighty and have nuclear weapons in abundance. Nuclear weapons do not deter war, destroying cities do not end wars.
Wars are the result of psychopaths running our countries.
What value is war? It kills millions, destroys property and costs $ millions to repay and to rebuild.
Only the war profiteers get benefit, while the millions of our country men die.
Many people are living tied to lies which can only bring pain, suffering, and loss.
Letting “authorities” tell you what is true is giving your fate to psychopathic, evil, cruel criminals.
--http://www.abodia.com/t/articles-1/nuclearhoax
I love the band, RUSH, for their musical wizardry, but they are Satanic Pantheists, and hate Christianity, as so they helped to perpetuate the Bigger Stick Theory of Nuclear Bombs in their smash hit, “Manhattan Project.”
RUSH: Manhattan Project Lyrics
Imagine a time
When it all began in the dying days of a war
A weapon, that would settle the score
Whoever found it first
Would be sure to do their worst
They always had before
Imagine a man
Where it all began
A scientist pacing the floor
In each nation, always eager to explore
To build the best big stick
To turn the winning trick
But this was something more
The big bang, took and shook the world
Shot down the rising sun
The end was begun, it would hit everyone
When the chain reaction was done
The big shots, try to hold it back
Fools try to wish it away
The hopeful depend on a world without end
Whatever the hopeless may say
Imagine a place
Where it all began
They gathered from across the land
To work in the secrecy of the desert sand
All of the brightest boys
To play with the biggest toys
More than they bargained for
The big bang, took and shook the world
Shot down the rising sun
The hopeful depend on a world without end
Whatever the hopeless may say
Imagine a man
When it all began
The pilot of Enola Gay
Flying out of the shock wave
On that August day
All the powers that be
And the course of history
Would be changed for evermore
The big bang, took and shook the world
Shot down the rising sun
The end was begun, it would hit everyone
When the chain reaction was done
The big shots, try to hold it back
Fools try to wish it away
The hopeful depend on a world without end
Whatever the hopeless may say
The big bang, took and shook the world
Shot down the rising sun
The hopeful depend on a world without end
Whatever the hopeless may say
The only thing worse than the khazarians are the ones used by the khazarians. What Stalin called the useful idiots.
I’ve also come to the conclusion that the brilliance of Reagan’s Star Wars program was that the USSR believed it was real (or, at least had to assume it was real) and they bankrupted themselves trying to develop a defense against a nonexistent threat. We are at war and have been at war against so many perceived but nonexistent enemies for decades. As Pogo once said “I have seen the enemy and he is us”.
“The lack of any nuclear detonations at the hands of enemy nations or terrorists (even accidentally) supports the notion that nukes do not exist.”
Yes.
I’ve got a gun in my pocket so empty out the cash drawer works sometimes both in film and real life, too.