Is The DNA Double Helix Shape Even Real?

Like The Covid Virus Hoax, we are always shown glossy animated cartoons of what these “expert scientists” have discovered is DNA. Nevertheless, there is a huge disconnect  between what electron microscopy images show and the glossy animated images we are shown of viruses and DNA.

An electron microscope is a microscope that uses a beam of electrons as a source of illumination. They use electron optics that are analogous to the glass lenses of an optical light microscope to control the electron beam, for instance focusing them to produce magnified images or electron diffraction patterns. As the wavelength of an electron can be up to 100,000 times smaller than that of visible light, electron microscopes have a much higher resolution of about 0.1 nm, which compares to about 200 nm for light microscopes.

When you Google electron microscopy image of a virus, you get this:

When you Google electron microscopy image of exosomes, you get this:

Notice how similar they are to the alleged Covid Virus?

***Exosomes are membrane-enclosed vesicles actively released into the extracellular space; whose content reflect the physiological/pathological state of the cells they originate from. These vesicles participate in cell-to-cell communication and transfer of biologically active proteins, lipids, and RNAs. Exosomes are the detoxification mechanism by which our body heals itself.

And this is what we are told the Covid Virus looks like:

When you Google electron microscopy image of DNA, you get this:

But this is what we have been shown, regarding what DNA looks like, since forever:

What’s really going on here?

The point I am making here is not that there is no subterranean mechanism for inherited traits to be passed on through breeding and Natural Selection. Rather, I am merely questioning the shape of DNA as a Double Helix pattern, which electron microscopy does not clearly illustrate. From day one, Geneticists, James Watson and Francis Crick, conducted no DNA experiments of their own, according to the U.S. National Library of Medicine. And yet in 1953, they magically discovered the DNA molecule, known as the Double Helix, by “drawing upon the experimental results of others” and relying on “brilliant intuition, persistence, and luck.” But there is a missing ingredient here. As the story goes, Francis Crick burst through the front door of his Cambridge home spouting barely-legible gibberish to his then-wife about “two spirals twisting in opposite directions from one another.” Being herself somewhat of an artist, she put vision to paper, and like Walt Disney with Mickey Mouse, the coiling Double Helix was promptly born.

This, they called science. Really? No experimentation. No experimental controls. No independent variable. No physical evidence for their claim. Is this really science or a mystical conjecture that swept the world like wildfire, resulting in an endless barrage of DNA cartoons and genetic claims, forevermore?

The DNA discovery has much in common with the birth of The Heliocentric Theory and the shape of The Earth. Suddenly, it was just a fact that The Earth is a sphere and, like The DNA discovery, an endless barrage of ball Earth cartoons came into existence before anyone had actually claimed to venture into mythical Outer Space to confirm and verify the claim. It is almost as if science has transmuted into a subtle art of cartoon manufacturing and CGI creation based on storytelling, conjecture, and unsubstantiated claims and assumptions.  

As such, the issue here is a matter of Genotype versus Phenotype. The terms Genotype and Phenotype may sound similar, but there is a huge difference between them. The Genotype is a set of genes in DNA responsible for unique traits or characteristics, while the Phenotype is the physical appearance or characteristic of an organism. We know that there are variations within species, which should not be confused or conflated with the absurd Darwinistic claim that species evolve into other species, which there is no scientific evidence for, but to say that it caused by a Double Helix DNA, with epigenetic malleability, is another thing entirely. Variation is the difference between individuals from the same species. This variation can be inherited from one generation to the next. The individuals that are better suited (adapted) to their environment will survive to reproduce. We know that. The kid that swallows the most marbles on the playground…dies. This is called Natural Selection.

In Genetics, The DNA molecule is thought to control the manufacture of enzymes and structural proteins. By controlling the manufacture of structural proteins, DNA is said to be able to influence the physical appearance of a cell. Well, actually I am not really questioning the inheritance of acquired characteristics through some kind of genetic mechanism of information. Again, I am simply addressing the discover of The DNA Double Helic shape by James Watson and Francis Crick, and in particularly, the way in which they discovered it, which has zero subscription to the scientific method or proper experimental design or controls. Essentially, they had a cartoon drawn up as their experimental proof and then celebrated at a pub.  

What Francis Crick essentially discovered, ironically enough, is The Mystical Caduceus, the staff carried by Hermes Trismegistus throughout ancient Greek mythology. One might immediately recognize The Caduceus should he have observed a pair of two intertwined snakes imprinted on ambulances and medical buildings across the world. Though one needn’t only look there. The twin serpents of The Double Helix seem to show up frequently throughout the annals of science, from the subatomic scale to the motions of celestial mechanics, and even the coils of entire galaxies. Additionally, the Sanskrit term for Kundalini, “Kundali Shakti,” translates as “Serpent Power.” Kundalini is thought to be an energy released within an individual using specific meditation techniques. It is represented symbolically as a dual serpent coiled at the base of the spine. In Sanskrit iconography, on either side of Sushumna Nadi, there are two channels of energy that support a balanced physical and mental energy: Ida and Pingala. Running from the tailbone to the third eye or Ajna Chakra, these channels carry masculine and feminine energy, and are said to be stimulated through Pranayama practices.

There’s simply no escaping the ancient Serpent, whether it be from mystical occultism, ancient metaphysics, or modern so-called “science.”

The Molecular Path to Shamanism: Francis Crick and the Double-Helix Delusion

At King’s College London, Rosalind Franklin allegedly obtained images of DNA using X-ray crystallography, an idea first broached by Maurice Wilkins. Franklin’s images allowed James Watson and Francis Crick to create their famous two-strand, or double-helix, model…or at least that was the official story.

Crick's Caduceus: Is DNA Another Occult Hoax of Scientism?:

Geneticists, James Watson and Francis Crick, a molecular biologist, biophysicist, and neuroscientist by trade, conducted no DNA experiments of their own, according to the U.S. National Library of Medicine. And yet in 1953 they discovered the DNA molecule known as the Double Helix by “drawing upon the experimental results of others” and relying on “brilliant intuition, persistence, and luck.” But there is a missing ingredient here. As the story goes, Francis Crick burst through the front door of his Cambridge home spouting barely-legible gibberish to his then-wife about “two spirals twisting in opposite directions from one another.” Being herself somewhat of an artist, she put vision to paper—and like Walt Disney with Mickey Mouse, the coiling double helix was promptly born. To celebrate, the couple met up with research partner James Watson, and the trio drunk themselves silly at a local pub. It should be noted that Crick was a devoted fan of author Aldous Huxley. He famously threw nude parties throughout the 1950’s and 60’s. But most importantly of all, Crick was a devoted connoisseur of LSD.

       What Francis Crick essentially discovered, ironically enough, is the caduceus—the staff carried by Hermes Trismegistus throughout ancient Greek mythology. One might immediately recognize the caduceus should he have observed a pair of two intertwined snakes imprinted on ambulances and medical buildings across the world. Though one needn’t only look there. The twin serpents of the double helix seem to show up frequently throughout the annals of science, from the subatomic scale to the motions of celestial mechanics and even the coils of entire galaxies. There’s simply no escaping the ancient Serpent.

       In Mutants & Mystics: Science Fiction, Superhero Comics, and the Paranormal, Author Jeffrey J. Kripal doesn’t mince his words when writing on the oversaturation of the caduceus: “It is at once the double-helix scepter of the DNA molecule, the phallic serpent who brought sex and death into the world in the myth of the Garden of Eden, and a sign of the kundalini, the two-spiraled currents of energy that are likened to a serpent as they spark and spike up, down, and around the central channel of the spinal column in Tantric yoga. Most of all, though, the caduceus is the staff of Hermes, the ancient Greek god of language and, later, occult philosophy, alchemy, and Western magic.”

       The staff of Hermes has been a favorite for British comic book writer Alan Moore, who openly advertises the arts in its many varying forms to be deeply rooted in occultism. His comic book series Promethea (1999-2005) was a cauldron for occult philosophy, Jewish mysticism, the Tarot, Tantric yoga, psychedelia, sex magic, and infamous “spheres” of the Kabbalah. Regarding his use of the caduceus, Moore explains: “Magic, after all, is ruled by Hermes, his symbol, this caduceus, its double-helix serpents representing mankind’s evolution. They wind apart, and then recombine, progressing towards their ultimate synthesis—towards winged blazing Godhead.”

        Yet Crick’s double-helix discovery ventures even further back than the Olympian who supplied Hermeticism to western civilization. To this the snake-worshiping Chaldeans deserve due-credit. Writes A.L. Frothingham in Babylonian Origin of Hermes the Snake-God, and of the Caduceus (1916): “The proto-Hermes was always a snake-god, and before the era of complete anthropomorphism he was thought of in snake form. But it is an essential element of his function that he was not a single snake—for the great single Earth Snake was the Mother goddess—but the double snake, male and female, the most prolific form of copulation in the animal kingdom.”

       But let’s not forget, the Egyptians also had a part in Crick’s discovery. Did Pharaoh not wear a cobra on his crown as a symbol of the divine word and third eye—the pineal gland—by which true hidden knowledge might be discovered to the devoted initiate? In his book, The Secret in the Bible, author Tony Bushby suggests the capstone of the Great Pyramid was once a clear crystal or glass that produced a visible beacon of light from its apex. He writes: “Whenever a light is shone down into a glass pyramid in exact scale or proportion as the Great Pyramid, a ‘Rainbow Serpent’ is created. The light provides a type of force or energy that, in turn, creates the vertical spiral of light, a serpent upraised, invisible in rock, but visible in a clear substance. That is what the Ancient Egyptian Priesthood meant when they said, ‘A serpent lies coiled in the Great Pyramid.’” Bushby’s conclusion is as you might now suspect. The Rainbow Serpent, directly referenced by the priesthood, was a double helix like representing Francis Crick’s strand of DNA.

       Every continent seems to have a role in ancient serpent worship. Claude Lévi-Strauss writes of the Aztecs: “In Aztec, the word “coatl” means both ‘serpent’ and ‘twin.’ The name Quetzalcoatl can thus be interpreted either as ‘Plumed serpent’ or ‘Magnificent twin.’” Throughout shamanic religions, from Australia to Tibet and eastern Asia, back into Egypt again, throughout Africa, and finally North and South America, visions of “spiral ladders” or “braided ropes” cannot be overlooked either. Authors Mircea Eliade, Willard R. Trask, and Wendy Doniger write in Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy, “the symbolism of the rope, like that of the ladder, necessarily implies communication between sky and earth. It is by means of a rope or a ladder (as, too, by a vine, a bridge, a chain of arnyaw, etc.) that the gods descend to earth and men go up to the sky.”

       In 1961, anthropologist Michael Harner journeyed to the Peruvian Amazon rainforest to study the shamanistic religion of the Conibo Indians. Here he encountered a world of true hallucination. Upon finally ingesting the hallucinogenic substance, and according to his own account, “giant reptilian creatures” resting “at the lowest depths of his brain” began to project a series of scenes and images before his eyes. Says Harner: “First they showed me the planet Earth as it was eons ago, before there was any life on it. I saw an ocean, barren land, and a bright blue sky. Then black specks dropped from the sky by the hundreds and landed in front of me on the barren landscape. I could see the ‘specks’ were actually large, shiny, black creatures with stubby pterodactyl-like wings and huge whale-like bodies….They explained to me in a kind of thought language that they were fleeing from something out in space. They had come to the planet Earth to escape their enemy. The creatures then showed me how they had created life on the planet in order to hide within the multitudinous forms and thus disguise their presence. Before me, the magnificence of plant and animal creation and speciation – hundreds of millions of years of activity – took place on a scale and with a vividness impossible to describe. I learned that the dragon-like creatures were thus inside all forms of life, including man.” Here comes the crucial part of Harner’s testimony to the drug. “In retrospect one could say they were almost like DNA, although at that time, 1961, I knew nothing of DNA.”

       Author Jeremy Narby also testifies to this bizarre Double-Helix knowledge among the shamans of the Peruvian rainforest when he writes: “By ritually ingesting mind-altering plant mixtures, Peruvian Amazon shamans take their consciousness down to the molecular level and gain access to biomolecular information.” Elsewhere he states: “The first [plant] contains a hallucinogenic substance, dimethyltryptamine, which also seems to be secreted by the human brain; but this hallucinogen has no effect when swallowed, because a stomach enzyme called monoamine oxidase blocks it. The second plant, however, contains several substances that inactivate this precise stomach enzyme, allowing the hallucinogen to reach the brain. So here are people without electron microscopes who choose, among some 80,000 Amazonian plant species, the leaves of a bush containing a hallucinogenic brain hormone, which they combine with a vine containing substances that inactivate an enzyme of the digestive tract, which would otherwise block the hallucinogenic effect. And they do this to modify their consciousness. It is as if they knew about the molecular properties of plants and the art of combining them, and when one asks them how they know these things, they say their knowledge comes directly from hallucinogenic plants….Most remarkably, what they gain access to is the DNA strand itself, which appears to be conscious and capable of bestowing real knowledge about botany, medicine, culture, and life itself. Nature is minded. Hence the ladders and snakes seen in the shamanic visions and the cosmic serpent creation myths found around the world.”

       See, this is what irks me about modern scientists—their shameless denial. I had the opportunity to sit down for breakfast with “Answers in Genesis” astronomer Danny Faulkner last week—a butting of heads which I am grateful for and will fondly remember—and at any rate, when I brought up the role Hermeticism and the Mystery Schools had in the shaping of western philosophy and the sciences, he immediately quipped: “No! No! No!  You have it backwards. Science came first and then the occult twisted and contorted it!”

       And yet, in light of what I’ve written—and so much more which I left out!—I can only conclude the U.S. National Library of Medicine is mocking us when it writes: “The double helix has not only reshaped biology, it has become a cultural icon, represented in sculpture, visual art, jewelry, and toys.”

       The double-snake helix, wherever it is found—from the staff of Hermes to the capstone of Egypt’s Great Pyramid, and not to be overlooked, India’s kundalini—is a “conscious entity,” if the occult has a say in it. And yet I cannot deny much has been accomplished through genetic studies. Just consider this, NASA has accomplished much as well. Many technological advances have been pushed through their pipeline and sold to the highest bidder, yet they will not show us a real photo of Earth. Like NASA’s “planet,” why do we have so many CG photos of the double-helix? Have doctors believed Crick and his contemporaries on blind faith or have countless others observed a 3-D double-helix through the microscope? The simplest web search delivers smoke and mirrors. CG…CG….CG…..and yet more CG. Until only a few years ago, we never once had an “actual photo” of Crick’s double-helix, and if you pay attention to the two pillars they’ve “photographed,” it looks stunningly Masonic. Ladder, coiling twin snakes, two pillars. Why couldn’t they photograph Crick’s discovery back in any other decade of the twentieth century? Perhaps we really do have a coiling double-helix. Maybe it’s all part of the enmity between the serpent and the woman. But one thing my studies into the blind faith demanded of Scientism has taught me, if it originates with esoteric learning, the occult, or the Mysteries, then I’m probably looking at wishful thinking on their part.

       Let us not forget, and thanks for reminding me; Francis Crick was not a fan of the Serpent’s great competitor, the religion of Christianity. Being ever so disdainful towards the Gospel which promised to crush the head of the Beguiler, he once quoted: “I do not respect Christian beliefs. I think they are ridiculous. If we could get rid of them we could more easily get down to the serious problem of trying to find out what the world is all about.” Crick later joked, “Christianity may be OK between consenting adults in private but should not be taught to young children.”

       The man who most certainly explored the doors of perception with LSD and other narcotics would rather indoctrinate our children with a coiling double-helix. Crick was pushing occultism and Freemasonry for the uninitiated.

--https://ourwayisthehighway.wordpress.com/2017/11/16/the-molecular-path-to-shamanism-francis-crick-and-the-double-helix-delusion/