Does Co2 Deplete the Ozone Layer Resulting in Temperature Variations?
Before any of this, let’s be clear about one thing. There is no evidence of any impermeable and solid barrier between the Earth’s atmospheric pressure gradients and the alleged vacuum of Outer Space in The Heliocentric Model, and therefore, the entire narrative of vacuum Outer Space is purely science fiction. Hence, whatever kind of alleged Co2 induced depletion of the Ozone Layer that we could discuss, cannot include anything to do with heat either escaping into the imaginary vacuum of Outer Space nor The Sun increasing its temperature from 93 million miles away.
The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that entropy always increases for all spontaneous processes. The law also states that heat always flows from higher to lower temperatures, and never flows in the reverse direction. Additionally, high pressure will always flow towards low pressure unless some kind of impermeable and solid barrier prevents this flow.
BOTH the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Gravitational Models clearly illustrate how the Earth's atmospheric pressure gradients cannot even form or be contained without an IMPERMEABLE AND SOLID CONTAINER.
This Biggest Flaws Concerning the Earth’s Pressure Gradients are as Follows:
· You would not even have an Exosphere, in the first place, unless an Impermeable and Solid Container was present. The pseudo-Riemannian Manifold as it traces geodesics in Einstein’s formulation of the non-force of Gravity is not a container.
· The Exosphere is merely the top strata of this homogeneous blanket of 7 layers. Without an Impermeable and Solid Container, none of them would even be in existence. But they are, which shows there is containment.
· The Earth’s pressure gradients, including The Exosphere, form a heterogeneous strata that is contiguous with a vacuum at 1×10-6 to <3×10-17 Torr 100 µPa to <3fPa. The Second Law of Thermodynamics is crystal clear about pressure gradient formation, including The Exosphere, as it is connected in a nested hierarchy with all that lay subterranean to it, thereby requiring a solid and impermeable barrier between these pressure gradients and any comparatively lower pressure system, such as the vacuum of alleged Outer Space if they are to remain intact above The Earth.
· Pressure gradients cannot form without containment according to The Second Law of Thermodynamics. As soon as you admit that there are pressure gradients, including The Exosphere, you just admitted that there is an Impermeable and Solid Container.
· Otherwise, you are committing a Second Law of Thermodynamics violation.
With That Said, Let’s Take Deeper Dive Into This Topic Before The Following Heliocentrists Have Their Say
First of all:
There is no Ozone hole at the South Pole because there is no South Pole. There may be varying distributions of Ozone at any partially region in the Stratosphere, and at varying times during the year, which may affect mean average temperatures, but nothing is escaping into mythical Outer Space. So let’s get that out of the way right from the start.
The Heliocentric Narrative States That:
“Ozone is one of the top greenhouse gases helping to hold in the heat from the sun's radiation. Like the other greenhouse gases, Ozone blocks heat from the Earth's surface and prevents it from escaping into Outer Space.”
Nevertheless, again, there is no evidence of Outer Space, and so, how is anything escaping into this mythical Outer Space? It’s not. If Ozone is accumulating or exhibiting depletion in the Stratosphere due to Co2 levels, that is certainly something to look at. But this whole narrative that the Earth’s heat is escaping into Outer Space has always merely been a science fiction trope that we see in Hollywood films, which was highjacked by corrupt and phony corporate funded Climatologist to ramp up as much existential terror in the masses as possible for optimum submission to The Climate Change Religion that we see rising like a dangerous Masonic Phoenix from The Vatican and United Nations.
The Global Warming Petition Project
There are several claims that large numbers of scientists do not agree with the theory of climate change, the best known of which a petition is organized by the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine (the OISM petition). This petition was signed by over 31,487 scientists and researchers with a BS Degrees or higher qualification, including 9,029 with PhDs.
Secondly:
No The Polar Ice Caps are not melting from any perceived greenhouse gas variations in the Stratosphere. Again, there is only one polar ice cap: The North Pole. The southern “ice cap” is actually a ring, called The Antarctic Ring. With that said, even NASA admits that these polarities are not melting, which exposes Climate Change for the hoax it is.
By Inigo Monzon:
“An environmental analyst claims that satellite data collected by NASA revealed polar ice caps have not melted due to global warming. The latest revelation heavily contradicts what climate change alarmists consider as definitive proof of the worldwide environmental crisis.
According to analyst James Taylor, head of the Spark of Freedom Foundation, the current state of the polar ice caps have not receded since NASA started collecting satellite images of them in 1979.
As indicated in NASA’s satellite data, the polar ice caps have maintained their extensive size from 1979 until the early 2000s. Although there are years when the ice caps lost a bit of their size, they were able to quickly bounce back in the following years.
Taylor explained that in the beginning of NASA’s satellite observations, the polar ice caps just came from a 30-year cooling trend, which ended during the late 1970s. This made the polar ice regions significantly larger compared to their past states in the previous decades.
Although they were abnormally large, the state of the polar ice caps in 1979 became the standard baseline in NASA’s study.
By 2005, a slightly constant decrease in the size of the polar ice caps was recorded. Through a post in Forbes, Taylor explained that the polar ice caps receded by about 10 percent since 1979.
Despite the decrease, the analyst maintained that 10 percent wasn’t a significant loss especially since the baseline for NASA’s observation showed an unusually large size for the polar ice caps. In addition, by 2012, the ice caps grew larger again and were even able to surpass their original size average in 1979.
Taylor noted that the recorded decrease from 2005 to 2012 is not enough to be considered as definitive proof of the effect of global warming on the Polar Regions. Instead, the decrease is only an indicator of the fluctuating environmental conditions that Earth’s is experiencing.
According to Taylor, the temporary loss experienced by polar ice caps during these years were not dangerous to humans. Aside from only suffering an insignificant loss, the polar ice caps were still able to substantially recover.”
Thirdly:
No, there is no such thing as Global Warming since there is no Globe. We do not live on a magic spinning ball in the imaginary vacuum of Outer Space. We live in an Enclosed Cosmological system, which is more akin to a terrarium than anything else. And so yes, there may be temperature fluctuations in our terrarium, but not “globally”.
Fourth:
“Carbon Dioxide has no direct effect on Ozone, unlike CFCs and HFCs. Higher levels of carbon dioxide, however, do have an indirect effect on the Ozone layer in the Stratosphere. What effect it has varies with which atmospheric layer it's in and on the latitude. In the lower Stratosphere, closest to the surface and close to the equator, increased Co2 is slowing the production of new Ozone, especially in the spring. But near the poles and in the upper Stratosphere, Co2 is increasing the amount of Ozone by preventing nitrogen oxide from breaking it down.” ( Kasandra Rose).
And so, yes, again there are always variation in Ozone levels in the Stratosphere, as there has been for thousands of years, depending upon which atmospheric layer we are looking at, which latitude, and which time of the year, but no, there is no direct one-to-one correlation between Carbon Dioxide emissions and Ozone distribution. The very idea that there is some kind of universally homogenous Co2 induced “Global Climate Crisis” is simply fear mongering intended to spread enough eco-terror for people to willingly submit and surrender their freedoms to tyrannical Climate Change Religion, which will track, surveille, tax, and limit all behavior, physical mobility, and expenditures, including the very expenditure of human breathing. After all, humans exhale carbon, which is “Killing The Planet” they say. Carbon dioxide is produced in the body as a result of cellular respiration, wherein vital nutrients are converted into energy in the presence of oxygen. The carbon dioxide produced is then removed from the body by dissolution in the blood and through binding with hemoglobin to be transported to the lungs, where it’s exhaled out from the nose and mouth. As such, the very act of breathing will be closely monitored and taxed by The Climate Change Religion, rest assured. Carbon tax is on the way.
They want you masked and almost dead…to “Save The Planet”.
Fifth: A Local Sun
To iterate, there is no evidence of any impermeable and solid barrier between the Earth’s atmospheric pressure gradients and the alleged vacuum of Outer Space in The Heliocentric Model, and therefore, the entire narrative of vacuum Outer Space is purely science fiction. Hence, whatever kind of alleged Co2 induced depletion of the Ozone Layer that we could discuss, cannot include anything to do with heat either escaping into the imaginary vacuum of Outer Space nor The Sun increasing its temperature from 93 million miles away. If there is any variance in Ozone distribution at any one particular region above The Earth for any reason whatsoever, it cannot affect the entire Earth. The Sun is not 93 million miles away and is local, and so, all you would have is temperature fluctuations in the precise region that the Sun is at any particular time of day, and that’s it…no crisis.
For instance, let’s say that the Ozone layer, which is measured in Dobson Units, exhibits some variation over Argentina one morning. Dobson Units are the number of Ozone molecules it takes to make a layer 0.01 millimeters thick. The average thickness of the Ozone layer is 300 Dobson units, or about 3 millimeters. That isn't very thick – it's about the thickness of three pennies stacked together. And so, let’s say you wake up in Argentina one morning and the Ozone layer is 0.013. That’s not a “Global Crisis”. It’s only a temperature variation in Argentina that morning which may make the mean average temperature drop 1 degree. And so, you note that the temperature outside has dropped from 84 degrees Fahrenheit to 83 degrees Fahrenheit due to an minuscule increase in Ozone layer distribution that morning.
Wow, big deal. Who cares.
Evidently the Climate Change eco-terror activists do because they need any variations in the daily temperature to support a narrative of Apocalyptic Climate Crisis. And they will use any variations in the daily temperature to point the figure at to Co2, and additionally attempt to limit all automobile usage. Nevertheless, Ozone depletion is not directly caused by Co2 Ozone depletion, but rather it is caused by chemicals containing the elements chlorine and bromine, which are halogens. They are important components of a class of refrigerants called chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) that were in heavy use in the mid-20th century. CFCs are inert and able to migrate to the upper atmosphere on wind currents, where the sun's ultraviolet energy breaks them apart.
But since the Sun is local, all you will ever see from any Ozone Layer distribution fluctuations is a local variance in the daily temperature.
Local Sun=Local Variance in The Daily Temperature
You are not going to see a huge worldwide variance in the daily temperature, and certainly not “Global”, since The Sun is only at any one particular region above the Earth and any one particular time. It not 93 million miles away attempting to heat up everything a; at once.
Sixth: The Sun in INSIDE “The Greenhouse”, Not Outside:
Since The Sun is inside The Firmament, and not 93 million miles away in imaginary Outer Space, there is no chance of it heating up or cooling down the entire Earth from any minor fluctuations in local Ozone distribution anomalies in the Stratosphere. Let’s say that The Enclosed System that we call Earth is a type of Greenhouse Terrarium. But The Sun is inside this terrarium. All that could ever happen from any fluctuations in local Ozone distributions is slight variation in temperature that apply DIRECTLY above the region where The Sun is currently warming the Earth.
Paying tribute to our Argentina example, you may see some plus or minus 2 degree fluctuation in daily temperature over that country on a Tuesday if the Ozone Layer is experiencing heightened chlorine and bromine levels in the Stratosphere that day, but that’s it. Again, no universal “Global Climate Crisis” can be deduced or derived anywhere in the actual legitimate climate science behind what has become a fake Climate Change Apocalypse to eco-terrorist activists.
Ok, in Light of the Aforementioned, Now Let’s Hear What The Official Heliocentric Explanation is For the Alleged Ozone Depletion From Co2
From Sciencing by Kasandra Rose:
“Five layers of atmosphere cloak the Earth. The lower atmospheric layer, in which people live and breathe, is the Troposphere. Two layers that make up the middle atmosphere, the Stratosphere, where jets fly, and the Mesosphere cover the Troposphere. The upper atmosphere contains both the Thermosphere, where The Aurora Borealis lights up the sky, and the Exosphere, where the atmosphere meets Space. The Ozone Layer lies within the Stratosphere. Carbon Dioxide concentrations are increasing in all layers but the Exosphere. Carbon Dioxide prevents the formation of new Ozone molecules in the Troposphere, and higher Co2 levels in the upper atmosphere may be contributing overall to the closing of the Ozone holes over the poles.
The Ozone Layer
Normally, molecular oxygen consists of two atoms of oxygen. In the Stratosphere, however, the sun's radiation breaks some of the molecular oxygen apart. When a single atom of oxygen bumps into molecular oxygen, the three atoms fuse together to form Ozone. There isn't a lot of Ozone in the Stratosphere, but what is there performs a very important task for living creatures on the surface of the planet. The Ozone is just the right size to bounce much of the sun's ultraviolet radiation back out into space and prevent it from reaching the Earth's surface. High levels of UV radiation cause skin cancer and blindness.
The Ozone Hole
In the mid-1980s, scientists discovered that a seasonal hole was forming in the Ozone layer over the South Pole. Something was destroying the Ozone layer in the upper atmosphere. Experiments identified fluorine, bromine, and chlorine in the form of chlorofluorocarbons, methyl bromide and hydrochlorofluorocarbons as the culprits. These chemicals were used in refrigerators, hairsprays, and fire extinguishers. Politicians and scientists combined forces to find substitutes for these harmful chemicals and outlaw the HFCs and CFCs that were causing the Ozone depletion. Now, the Ozone layer is rapidly recovering.
Carbon Dioxide
Carbon Dioxide has no direct effect on Ozone, unlike CFCs and HFCs. Higher levels of carbon dioxide, however, do have an indirect effect on the Ozone layer in the Stratosphere. What effect it has varies with which atmospheric layer it's in and on the latitude. In the lower Stratosphere, closest to the surface and close to the equator, increased Co2 is slowing the production of new Ozone, especially in the spring. But near the poles and in the upper Stratosphere, Co2 is increasing the amount of Ozone by preventing nitrogen oxide from breaking it down. According to a study published in the March 2002 Journal of Geographical Research by a joint research team from the University of Maryland and NASA, overall, the increased amount of Co2 in the atmosphere is speeding up the recovery of the Ozone layer -- including the hole at the South Pole.
Ozone and Climate Change
Ozone is one of the top greenhouse gases helping to hold in the heat from the sun's radiation. Like the other greenhouse gases, Ozone blocks heat from the Earth's surface and prevents it from escaping into outer space. This insulating effect is important because otherwise the surface of the Earth would quickly cool down to very cold temperatures at night. Eventually, the planet would become inhospitable to most life forms. Too many greenhouse gases, though, cause too much heat to be held in at night, which causes a slow increase in the average global temperature. Despite Ozone's participation as a greenhouse gas, it's still important that it return to its normal levels. If Ozone doesn't return to normal levels, the risk of developing skin cancer and cataracts increases from the increased levels of UV radiation that will reach the Earth.
What is Ozone Layer Depletion by Chris Deziel:
In 1974, chemists Mario Molina and Sherwood Rowland of the University of California, Irvine, first warned of the danger of Ozone deterioration in the atmosphere. Their predictions were corroborated by observation in 1985, when an Ozone hole was detected above the Antarctic. The world took notice and agreed in Montreal in 1987 to do something about the depletion of the Ozone layer. In 2018, scientists cautiously announced that the Ozone hole, which has been growing since it was discovered in 1985, may have started to shrink. If the actions of humans have brought about an Ozone layer healing, the international community has proven that it can solve serious environmental problems when everyone works together.
What is Ozone and Where is the Ozone Layer?
High above the ground – between 9 and 18 miles (15 and 30 kilometers) to be exact – a thin layer of Ozone absorbs ultraviolet sunlight, thus protecting everything and everyone on the ground from exposure to the deadly radiation. The Ozone molecule (O3) is composed of three oxygen atoms. It forms when atmospheric oxygen (O2) interacts with solar radiation and breaks apart into two oxygen atoms; each atom then joins up with an oxygen molecule. The Ozone molecule is unstable, so it soon decays to again form molecular oxygen. This cyclic process absorbs radiation and is constantly occurring in the upper reaches of the Stratosphere.
Scientists measure the Ozone layer in Dobson units, which is the number of Ozone molecules it takes to make a layer 0.01 millimeters thick. The average thickness of the Ozone layer is 300 Dobson units, or about 3 millimeters. That isn't very thick – it's about the thickness of three pennies stacked together.
Ozone Depletion Definition and How it Happens
Ozone depletion is caused by chemicals containing the elements chlorine and bromine, which are halogens. They are important components of a class of refrigerants called chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) that were in heavy use in the mid-20th century. CFCs are inert and able to migrate to the upper atmosphere on wind currents, where the sun's ultraviolet energy breaks them apart.
Chlorine and bromine atoms are highly reactive, and once freed from the CFC molecules, they react with the extra oxygen atom in Ozone to produce the hypochlorite (ClO-) or hypobromite (BrO-) ions and molecular oxygen. These ions are still unstable, and they react with a second Ozone molecule to produce more molecular oxygen and leave the halogen ion free to start the process over again.
The most severe depletion of the Ozone layer occurs over the South Pole in late winter and early spring. At that time, the Ozone layer is reduced to as little as 100 Dobson units, or about the thickness of a dime. Since it was discovered, this "Ozone hole" has grown larger in each successive Antarctic winter before it disappears in the summer.
The Montreal Protocol and Ozone-Layer Healing
In 1987, a group of 24 nations met in Montreal and negotiated the "Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer." They agreed to phase out the use of CFCs and other Ozone-depleting chemicals by 1995. Since that time, the Ozone hole has continued to grow, largely due to chemicals that were already in the atmosphere. However, in 2016, a group of MIT scientists found evidence of Ozone-layer healing. The Antarctic Ozone hole begins growing later in the season, does not grow as large and is no longer as deep. The scientists see this as proof that the Montreal Protocol is working. If it is and continues to do so, they expect the hole to completely heal by the middle of the 21st century.”